← Models

Gemini 4 Carbon vs Qwen3.8 Max

Compare Gemini 4 Carbon from Google and Qwen3.8 Max from Qwen on key metrics including benchmarks, price, context length, and other model features. Access both models and hundreds of others through the AIHubMix API.

GoogleGemini 4 CarbonQwenQwen3.8 Max
Google logo
Gemini 4 Carbon
Google · text → text

Gemini 4 Carbon is Google DeepMind’s multimodal model for complex coding, long-running agent workflows, and cybersecurity defense. Building on Gemini 4 Argon, it improves software engineering, vulnerability detection and remediation, multimodal understanding, and execution across challenging, multi-step tasks.

Input$2 /M
Output$10 /M
Cache read$0.1 /M
Qwen logo
Qwen3.8 Max
Qwen · text, image, video → text

Qwen3.8-Max is Alibaba Cloud Tongyi Qianwen's next-generation flagship large language model, featuring a mixture-of-experts (MoE) architecture with 2.4 trillion parameters. It achieves another breakthrough in encoding depth, enabling it to handle more complex engineering-grade projects and long-term autonomous development; collaborative agent capabilities are significantly enhanced, performing more confidently in multi-tool orchestration and end-to-end delivery; visual understanding is comprehensively improved, with more sensitive and accurate chart reasoning, document parsing, and multimodal perception. Continuing the 1-million-context window, reasoning modes, and a complete tool ecosystem, it continues to evolve at a higher level of intelligence.

Input$1.69 /M
Output$5.07 /M
Cache read$0.169 /M

Pricing & Specifications

Prices are per million tokens. Time to First Token and throughput are rolling averages measured on AIHubMix.

Gemini 4 Carbon
Qwen3.8 Max
Input /M
$2
$1.69
Output /M
$10
$5.07
Cache read /M
$0.1
$0.169
Context length
0
1,000,000
Max output
0
131,072
Time to First Token
-
16.2 s
Throughput
-
39.9 tok/s
Modalities
text
textimagevideo
Supported Parameters
toolsfunction callingstructured outputsweblong contextthinking
API Formats
Released
November 11, 2026
August 3, 2026

Promotional prices show the discounted rate; see each model page for promotion windows.

Activity Past 30 Days

Daily traffic served through AIHubMix — how demand for each model is trending.

gemini-4-carbonqwen3.8-max

Tokens / day

-

Requests / day

-

Performance Past 3 Days

Measured on real AIHubMix traffic, hourly buckets. Gaps mean no traffic in that hour.

gemini-4-carbonqwen3.8-max

Throughput (tok/s)

-

TTFT (s)

-

Uptime (%)

-

LMArena Benchmarks

LMArena ratings by capability (Bradley-Terry, commonly called Elo). Higher is better.

Text
gemini-4-carbonqwen3.8-max
1440150015601620
Overall
14821528
Coding
15251573
Math
15031525
Hard prompts
15041548
Instruction following
14751525
Multi-turn
14941559
Creative writing
14691515
Longer query
14921542
Chinese
15381588
English
14921523
WebDev Arena
gemini-4-carbonqwen3.8-max
1600168017601840
Overall
16721768
React
16821791
HTML
16261780
Gaming
17371857
Simulations
16741859
Data analytics
16151667

Source: LMArena (arena.ai) leaderboard, imported by AIHubMix. Models without published ratings are omitted per chart.

Cost calculator

Estimate your monthly bill for the same workload on each model.

Qwen3.8 Max
$177 /mo
Gemini 4 Carbon
$270 /mo

Monthly = daily × 30. Discounted rates applied where a promotion is active.

FAQ

Which is cheaper: Gemini 4 Carbon, Qwen3.8 Max?

Qwen3.8 Max: $5.07/M output tokens; Gemini 4 Carbon: $10/M. Use the cost calculator above to estimate your own workload.

How do their coding arena scores compare?

Gemini 4 Carbon: 1573; Qwen3.8 Max: 1525 (LMArena coding leaderboard).

What inputs and capabilities does each model support?

Gemini 4 Carbon accepts text input; Qwen3.8 Max accepts text, image and video input and supports tool calling, function calling, structured outputs, web search, long context and thinking.

Can I call Gemini 4 Carbon and Qwen3.8 Max with the same API key?

Yes. AIHubMix serves every model on this page behind one OpenAI-compatible endpoint, so switching between them is a one-line change to the model field — no second account, key or SDK.

Popular comparisons

Related model match-ups readers also look at.