Models

glm-5.2 vs kimi-k3

Output tokens cost $1.97 per million on glm-5.2 and $15.00 per million on kimi-k3. Input tokens cost $0.56 per million on glm-5.2 and $3.00 per million on kimi-k3. Cached input tokens are billed at $0.14 per million on glm-5.2 and $0.30 per million on kimi-k3. Discounted rates are shown where a promotion is active. Context windows are 1,000,000 tokens on glm-5.2 and 1,048,576 tokens on kimi-k3. First-token latency measured on AIHubMix is 1.8s on glm-5.2 and 6.8s on kimi-k3. Measured output throughput is 46.9 tokens/s on glm-5.2 and 32.2 tokens/s on kimi-k3.

Z.AIglm-5.2Moonshot AIkimi-k3
up to 50% off·14:00–23:59 UTC
Z.AI
glm-5.2
Z.AI · text → text

GLM-5.2 is Z.ai’s flagship model for the era of long-horizon tasks. With a truly usable 1M-token context window, it can handle project-level engineering context, execute long-running tasks more reliably, follow engineering standards more consistently, and complete the full development workflow from requirements to multi-platform deployment in a single task.

Input$1.13$0.56 /M
Output$3.94$1.97 /M
Moonshot AI
kimi-k3
Moonshot AI · text, image, video → text

Kimi K3 is Kimi’s flagship model for long-horizon coding and end-to-end knowledge work, with a 1M-token context window and industry-leading intelligence.

Input$3.00 /M
Output$15.00 /M

Specs & Pricing

Prices are per million tokens. Latency and throughput are rolling averages measured on AIHubMix.

glm-5.2
kimi-k3
Input price
$1.13$0.5650%
$3.00
Output price
$3.94$1.9750%
$15.00
Cache read
$0.28$0.1450%
$0.30
Context window
1,000,000
1,048,576
Max output
128,000
1,048,576
Latency (first token)
1.8 s
6.8 s
Throughput
46.9 TPS
32.2 TPS
Modalities
text
textimagevideo
Features
thinkingtoolsfunction callingstructured outputs
thinkingfunction callingstructured outputs
Endpoints
chat_completions · claude_api

Promotional prices show the discounted rate; see each model page for promotion windows.

Usage on AIHubMix last 30 days

Daily traffic served through AIHubMix — how demand for each model is trending.

glm-5.2kimi-k3

Tokens / day

-

Requests / day

-

Live Performance last 3 days

Measured on real AIHubMix traffic, hourly buckets. Gaps mean no traffic in that hour.

glm-5.2kimi-k3

Throughput (TPS)

-

Latency (s)

-

Uptime (%)

-

Cost Calculator

Estimate your monthly bill for the same workload on each model.

glm-5.2
$127$63.38 /mo
kimi-k3
$405 /mo

Monthly = daily × 30. Discounted rates applied where a promotion is active.

FAQ

Which is cheaper: glm-5.2, kimi-k3?

glm-5.2: $1.97/M output tokens; kimi-k3: $15.00/M. Use the cost calculator above to estimate your own workload.

Which responds faster?

glm-5.2: 1.8s first-token latency measured on AIHubMix; see the live performance charts above for how each model behaves across the day.

How large is each context window?

glm-5.2 accepts 1,000,000 and kimi-k3 accepts 1,048,576 input tokens. Maximum output per request is 128,000 tokens on glm-5.2 and 1,048,576 tokens on kimi-k3.

Which one generates tokens faster?

glm-5.2 at 46.9 tokens/s and kimi-k3 at 32.2 tokens/s, measured as output throughput on AIHubMix — a separate metric from first-token latency.

What inputs and capabilities does each model support?

glm-5.2 accepts text input and supports thinking, tool calling, function calling and structured outputs; kimi-k3 accepts text, image and video input and supports thinking, function calling and structured outputs.

Can I call glm-5.2 and kimi-k3 with the same API key?

Yes. AIHubMix serves every model on this page behind one OpenAI-compatible endpoint, so switching between them is a one-line change to the model field — no second account, key or SDK.

Popular Comparisons

Related model match-ups readers also look at.