← Models

Gemini 4 Carbon vs Claude Fable 5.2

Compare Gemini 4 Carbon from Google and Claude Fable 5.2 from Anthropic on key metrics including benchmarks, price, context length, and other model features. Access both models and hundreds of others through the AIHubMix API.

GoogleGemini 4 CarbonAnthropicClaude Fable 5.2
Google logo
Gemini 4 Carbon
Google · text, image, video, audio, pdf → text

Gemini 4 Carbon is Google DeepMind’s multimodal model for complex coding, long-running agent workflows, and cybersecurity defense. Building on Gemini 4 Argon, it improves software engineering, vulnerability detection and remediation, multimodal understanding, and execution across challenging, multi-step tasks.

Input$2 /M
Output$10 /M
Cache read$0.1 /M
Anthropic logo
Claude Fable 5.2
Anthropic · text, image, pdf → text

Claude Fable 5.2 is Anthropic’s multimodal reasoning model for complex coding, deep research, and long-running agent workflows. It supports text and image inputs, with improved reasoning, coding, and visual understanding, and generates output up to 30% faster than Fable 5.1.

Input$8.8 /M
Output$44 /M
Cache read$0.22 /M

Pricing & Specifications

Prices are per million tokens. Time to First Token and throughput are rolling averages measured on AIHubMix.

Gemini 4 Carbon
Claude Fable 5.2
Input /M
$2
$8.8
Output /M
$10
$44
Cache read /M
$0.1
$0.22
Context length
1,048,576
1,000,000
Max output
65,536
128,000
Time to First Token
13.5 s
7.7 s
Throughput
77.2 tok/s
88.1 tok/s
Modalities
textimagevideoaudiopdf
textimagepdf
Supported Parameters
API Formats
Released
November 11, 2026
November 10, 2026

Promotional prices show the discounted rate; see each model page for promotion windows.

Activity Past 30 Days

Daily traffic served through AIHubMix — how demand for each model is trending.

gemini-4-carbonclaude-fable-5-2

Tokens / day

-

Requests / day

-

Performance Past 3 Days

Measured on real AIHubMix traffic, hourly buckets. Gaps mean no traffic in that hour.

gemini-4-carbonclaude-fable-5-2

Throughput (tok/s)

-

TTFT (s)

-

Uptime (%)

-

LMArena Benchmarks

LMArena ratings by capability (Bradley-Terry, commonly called Elo). Higher is better.

WebDev Arena
gemini-4-carbonclaude-fable-5-2
16401720180018801960
Overall
17681836
React
17921907
HTML
17501770
Gaming
18571940
Simulations
18621879
Data analytics
16661688

Source: LMArena (arena.ai) leaderboard, imported by AIHubMix. Models without published ratings are omitted per chart.

Cost calculator

Estimate your monthly bill for the same workload on each model.

Gemini 4 Carbon
$270 /mo
Claude Fable 5.2
$1,188 /mo

Monthly = daily × 30. Discounted rates applied where a promotion is active.

FAQ

Which is cheaper: Gemini 4 Carbon, Claude Fable 5.2?

Gemini 4 Carbon: $10/M output tokens; Claude Fable 5.2: $44/M. Use the cost calculator above to estimate your own workload.

Which responds faster?

Claude Fable 5.2: 7.7s time to first token measured on AIHubMix; see the live performance charts above for how each model behaves across the day.

How large is each context window?

Gemini 4 Carbon accepts 1,048,576 and Claude Fable 5.2 accepts 1,000,000 input tokens. Maximum output per request is 65,536 tokens on Gemini 4 Carbon and 128,000 tokens on Claude Fable 5.2.

Which one generates tokens faster?

Claude Fable 5.2 at 88.1 tok/s and Gemini 4 Carbon at 77.2 tok/s, measured as output throughput on AIHubMix — a separate metric from time to first token.

What inputs and capabilities does each model support?

Gemini 4 Carbon accepts text, image, video, audio and PDF input; Claude Fable 5.2 accepts text, image and PDF input.

Can I call Gemini 4 Carbon and Claude Fable 5.2 with the same API key?

Yes. AIHubMix serves every model on this page behind one OpenAI-compatible endpoint, so switching between them is a one-line change to the model field — no second account, key or SDK.

Popular comparisons

Related model match-ups readers also look at.