Models

Gemini 3.6 Flash vs Qwen3.7 Flash

Compare Gemini 3.6 Flash from Google and Qwen3.7 Flash from Qwen on key metrics including benchmarks, price, context length, and other model features. Access both models and hundreds of others through the AIHubMix API.

GoogleGemini 3.6 FlashQwenQwen3.7 Flash
Google logo
Gemini 3.6 Flash
Google · text, image, video, audio, pdf → text

Gemini 3.6 Flash provides sustained frontier-level intelligence optimized for real-world tasks at a higher speed and lower cost. Designed for the agentic era, it excels at code generation, agentic execution, and spatial reasoning. This model is particularly effective for rapid agentic loops involving complex coding cycles and iterations.

Input$1.5 /M
Output$7.5 /M
Cache read$0.15 /M
Qwen logo
Qwen3.7 Flash
Qwen · text, image, video → text

The Qwen 3.7 series' mid-to-high cost-performance "Plus" model builds on strong text capabilities with a comprehensive upgrade to vision-language abilities, while retaining full agent capabilities in coding, tool use, and productivity workflows. Its core features are multimodal interactive hybrid agent capabilities, able to perceive real-world scenes, read screens and operate GUIs, generate code based on visual references, and provide end-to-end navigation of mobile applications.

Input$0.0282 /M
Output$0.1128 /M
Cache read$0.0056 /M

Pricing & Specifications

Prices are per million tokens. Time to First Token and throughput are rolling averages measured on AIHubMix.

Gemini 3.6 Flash
Qwen3.7 Flash
Input /M
$1.5
$0.0282
Output /M
$7.5
$0.1128
Cache read /M
$0.15
$0.0056
Context length
1,048,576
1,000,000
Max output
65,536
131,072
Time to First Token
1.7 s
3.7 s
Throughput
98.9 tok/s
56.6 tok/s
Modalities
textimagevideoaudiopdf
textimagevideo
Supported Parameters
thinkingtoolsfunction callingstructured outputsweblong context
toolsfunction callingstructured outputsweblong contextthinking
API Formats
chat_completions · gemini_api · claude_api
Released
July 21, 2026
July 15, 2026

Promotional prices show the discounted rate; see each model page for promotion windows.

Activity Past 30 Days

Daily traffic served through AIHubMix — how demand for each model is trending.

gemini-3.6-flashqwen3.7-flash

Tokens / day

-

Requests / day

-

Performance Past 3 Days

Measured on real AIHubMix traffic, hourly buckets. Gaps mean no traffic in that hour.

gemini-3.6-flashqwen3.7-flash

Throughput (tok/s)

-

TTFT (s)

-

Uptime (%)

-

Cost calculator

Estimate your monthly bill for the same workload on each model.

Qwen3.7 Flash
$3.38 /mo
Gemini 3.6 Flash
$203 /mo

Monthly = daily × 30. Discounted rates applied where a promotion is active.

FAQ

Which is cheaper: Gemini 3.6 Flash, Qwen3.7 Flash?

Qwen3.7 Flash: $0.1128/M output tokens; Gemini 3.6 Flash: $7.5/M. Use the cost calculator above to estimate your own workload.

Which responds faster?

Gemini 3.6 Flash: 1.7s time to first token measured on AIHubMix; see the live performance charts above for how each model behaves across the day.

How large is each context window?

Gemini 3.6 Flash accepts 1,048,576 and Qwen3.7 Flash accepts 1,000,000 input tokens. Maximum output per request is 65,536 tokens on Gemini 3.6 Flash and 131,072 tokens on Qwen3.7 Flash.

Which one generates tokens faster?

Gemini 3.6 Flash at 98.9 tok/s and Qwen3.7 Flash at 56.6 tok/s, measured as output throughput on AIHubMix — a separate metric from time to first token.

What inputs and capabilities does each model support?

Gemini 3.6 Flash accepts text, image, video, audio and PDF input and supports thinking, tool calling, function calling, structured outputs, web search and long context; Qwen3.7 Flash accepts text, image and video input and supports tool calling, function calling, structured outputs, web search, long context and thinking.

Can I call Gemini 3.6 Flash and Qwen3.7 Flash with the same API key?

Yes. AIHubMix serves every model on this page behind one OpenAI-compatible endpoint, so switching between them is a one-line change to the model field — no second account, key or SDK.

Popular comparisons

Related model match-ups readers also look at.