Models

deepinfra-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it vs gemini-2.5-flash-lite

Output tokens cost $0.39 per million on deepinfra-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it and $0.40 per million on gemini-2.5-flash-lite. Input tokens cost $0.09 per million on deepinfra-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it and $0.10 per million on gemini-2.5-flash-lite. Cached input tokens are billed at $0.01 per million on deepinfra-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it and $0.01 per million on gemini-2.5-flash-lite. Context lengths are 262,100 tokens on deepinfra-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it and 1,048,576 tokens on gemini-2.5-flash-lite. Time to first token (TTFT) measured on AIHubMix is 0.4s on deepinfra-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it and 3.2s on gemini-2.5-flash-lite. Measured output throughput is 42.6 tok/s on deepinfra-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it and 74.7 tok/s on gemini-2.5-flash-lite.

Googledeepinfra-gemma-4-26b-a4b-itGooglegemini-2.5-flash-lite
Google logo
deepinfra-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it
Google · → text

A Mixture-of-Experts model that activates only 4B parameters per inference,delivering high-performance reasoning with a fraction of the memory cost - idealfor cost-efficient, high-throughput server deployments.

Input$0.09 /M
Output$0.39 /M
Google logo
gemini-2.5-flash-lite
Google · text, image, audio, video → text

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is a balanced model from Google, optimized for applications that require low-latency performance. It retains the practical capabilities of the Gemini 2.5 family, including configurable reasoning based on budget, integration with tools such as grounding via Google Search and code execution, multimodal input support, and an ultra-long context window of up to 1 million tokens, delivering a strong balance between efficiency, functionality, and cost.

Input$0.10 /M
Output$0.40 /M

Pricing & Specifications

Prices are per million tokens. Time to First Token and throughput are rolling averages measured on AIHubMix.

deepinfra-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it
gemini-2.5-flash-lite
Input /M
$0.09
$0.10
Output /M
$0.39
$0.40
Cache read /M
$0.01
$0.01
Context length
262,100
1,048,576
Max output
131,100
65,536
Time to First Token
0.4 s
3.2 s
Throughput
42.6 tok/s
74.7 tok/s
Modalities
textimageaudiovideo
Supported Parameters
toolsfunction callingstructured outputslong context
API Formats

Promotional prices show the discounted rate; see each model page for promotion windows.

Activity Past 30 Days

Daily traffic served through AIHubMix — how demand for each model is trending.

deepinfra-gemma-4-26b-a4b-itgemini-2.5-flash-lite

Tokens / day

-

Requests / day

-

Performance Past 3 Days

Measured on real AIHubMix traffic, hourly buckets. Gaps mean no traffic in that hour.

deepinfra-gemma-4-26b-a4b-itgemini-2.5-flash-lite

Throughput (tok/s)

-

TTFT (s)

-

Uptime (%)

-

Cost calculator

Estimate your monthly bill for the same workload on each model.

deepinfra-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it
$11.06 /mo
gemini-2.5-flash-lite
$12.00 /mo

Monthly = daily × 30. Discounted rates applied where a promotion is active.

FAQ

Which is cheaper: deepinfra-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it, gemini-2.5-flash-lite?

deepinfra-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it: $0.39/M output tokens; gemini-2.5-flash-lite: $0.40/M. Use the cost calculator above to estimate your own workload.

Which responds faster?

deepinfra-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it: 0.4s time to first token measured on AIHubMix; see the live performance charts above for how each model behaves across the day.

How large is each context window?

deepinfra-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it accepts 262,100 and gemini-2.5-flash-lite accepts 1,048,576 input tokens. Maximum output per request is 131,100 tokens on deepinfra-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it and 65,536 tokens on gemini-2.5-flash-lite.

Which one generates tokens faster?

gemini-2.5-flash-lite at 74.7 tok/s and deepinfra-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it at 42.6 tok/s, measured as output throughput on AIHubMix — a separate metric from time to first token.

Can I call deepinfra-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it and gemini-2.5-flash-lite with the same API key?

Yes. AIHubMix serves every model on this page behind one OpenAI-compatible endpoint, so switching between them is a one-line change to the model field — no second account, key or SDK.

Popular comparisons

Related model match-ups readers also look at.