Models

deepinfra-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it vs gemini-2.5-flash-image

Output tokens cost $0.39 per million on deepinfra-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it and $2.50 per million on gemini-2.5-flash-image. Input tokens cost $0.09 per million on deepinfra-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it and $0.30 per million on gemini-2.5-flash-image. Cached input tokens are billed at $0.01 per million on deepinfra-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it and $0.30 per million on gemini-2.5-flash-image. Context lengths are 262,100 tokens on deepinfra-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it and 32,800 tokens on gemini-2.5-flash-image. Time to first token (TTFT) measured on AIHubMix is 0.4s on deepinfra-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it and 14.6s on gemini-2.5-flash-image. Measured output throughput is 42.6 tok/s on deepinfra-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it and 100.1 tok/s on gemini-2.5-flash-image.

Googledeepinfra-gemma-4-26b-a4b-itGooglegemini-2.5-flash-image
Google logo
deepinfra-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it
Google · → text

A Mixture-of-Experts model that activates only 4B parameters per inference,delivering high-performance reasoning with a fraction of the memory cost - idealfor cost-efficient, high-throughput server deployments.

Input$0.09 /M
Output$0.39 /M
Google logo
gemini-2.5-flash-image
Google · image, text → text

Gemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano-Banana) is a state-of-the-art image generation and editing model that enables seamless blending of multiple images into a single composition while maintaining character consistency for rich visual storytelling. It supports precise, targeted image transformations through natural language instructions and leverages built-in world knowledge for both image generation and editing, making it well suited for creative design, content production, advertising, and visual expression workflows.

Input$0.30 /M
Output$2.50 /M

Pricing & Specifications

Prices are per million tokens. Time to First Token and throughput are rolling averages measured on AIHubMix.

deepinfra-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it
gemini-2.5-flash-image
Input /M
$0.09
$0.30
Output /M
$0.39
$2.50
Cache read /M
$0.01
$0.30
Context length
262,100
32,800
Max output
131,100
8,000
Time to First Token
0.4 s
14.6 s
Throughput
42.6 tok/s
100.1 tok/s
Modalities
imagetext
Supported Parameters
API Formats

Promotional prices show the discounted rate; see each model page for promotion windows.

Activity Past 30 Days

Daily traffic served through AIHubMix — how demand for each model is trending.

deepinfra-gemma-4-26b-a4b-itgemini-2.5-flash-image

Tokens / day

-

Requests / day

-

Performance Past 3 Days

Measured on real AIHubMix traffic, hourly buckets. Gaps mean no traffic in that hour.

deepinfra-gemma-4-26b-a4b-itgemini-2.5-flash-image

Throughput (tok/s)

-

TTFT (s)

-

Uptime (%)

-

Cost calculator

Estimate your monthly bill for the same workload on each model.

deepinfra-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it
$11.06 /mo
gemini-2.5-flash-image
$55.49 /mo

Monthly = daily × 30. Discounted rates applied where a promotion is active.

FAQ

Which is cheaper: deepinfra-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it, gemini-2.5-flash-image?

deepinfra-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it: $0.39/M output tokens; gemini-2.5-flash-image: $2.50/M. Use the cost calculator above to estimate your own workload.

Which responds faster?

deepinfra-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it: 0.4s time to first token measured on AIHubMix; see the live performance charts above for how each model behaves across the day.

How large is each context window?

deepinfra-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it accepts 262,100 and gemini-2.5-flash-image accepts 32,800 input tokens. Maximum output per request is 131,100 tokens on deepinfra-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it and 8,000 tokens on gemini-2.5-flash-image.

Which one generates tokens faster?

gemini-2.5-flash-image at 100.1 tok/s and deepinfra-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it at 42.6 tok/s, measured as output throughput on AIHubMix — a separate metric from time to first token.

Can I call deepinfra-gemma-4-26b-a4b-it and gemini-2.5-flash-image with the same API key?

Yes. AIHubMix serves every model on this page behind one OpenAI-compatible endpoint, so switching between them is a one-line change to the model field — no second account, key or SDK.

Popular comparisons

Related model match-ups readers also look at.