← Models

Claude Opus 5.5 vs Gemini 4 Carbon

Compare Claude Opus 5.5 from Anthropic and Gemini 4 Carbon from Google on key metrics including benchmarks, price, context length, and other model features. Access both models and hundreds of others through the AIHubMix API.

AnthropicClaude Opus 5.5GoogleGemini 4 Carbon
Anthropic logo
Claude Opus 5.5
Anthropic · text, image, pdf → text

Claude Opus 5.5 is Anthropic’s latest flagship model. In Anthropic’s comprehensive alignment testing, Opus 5.5 is the strongest-performing model tested to date. It also includes the safety safeguards Anthropic has developed for its most capable models.

Input$4 /M
Output$20 /M
Cache read$0.2 /M
Google logo
Gemini 4 Carbon
Google · text, image, video, audio, pdf → text

Gemini 4 Carbon is Google DeepMind’s multimodal model for complex coding, long-running agent workflows, and cybersecurity defense. Building on Gemini 4 Argon, it improves software engineering, vulnerability detection and remediation, multimodal understanding, and execution across challenging, multi-step tasks.

Input$2 /M
Output$10 /M
Cache read$0.1 /M

Pricing & Specifications

Prices are per million tokens. Time to First Token and throughput are rolling averages measured on AIHubMix.

Claude Opus 5.5
Gemini 4 Carbon
Input /M
$4
$2
Output /M
$20
$10
Cache read /M
$0.2
$0.1
Context length
1,000,000
1,048,576
Max output
128,000
65,536
Time to First Token
0.9 s
14.1 s
Throughput
99.7 tok/s
45.7 tok/s
Modalities
textimagepdf
textimagevideoaudiopdf
Supported Parameters
API Formats
Released
September 23, 2026
November 11, 2026

Promotional prices show the discounted rate; see each model page for promotion windows.

Activity Past 30 Days

Daily traffic served through AIHubMix — how demand for each model is trending.

claude-opus-5-5gemini-4-carbon

Tokens / day

-

Requests / day

-

Performance Past 3 Days

Measured on real AIHubMix traffic, hourly buckets. Gaps mean no traffic in that hour.

claude-opus-5-5gemini-4-carbon

Throughput (tok/s)

-

TTFT (s)

-

Uptime (%)

-

LMArena Benchmarks

LMArena ratings by capability (Bradley-Terry, commonly called Elo). Higher is better.

Text
claude-opus-5-5gemini-4-carbon
1480152015601600
Overall
15061526
Coding
15461567
Math
15191519
Hard prompts
15301546
Instruction following
15191525
Multi-turn
15011564
Creative writing
15151518
Longer query
15201537
Chinese
15671585
English
15151524

Source: LMArena (arena.ai) leaderboard, imported by AIHubMix. Models without published ratings are omitted per chart.

Cost calculator

Estimate your monthly bill for the same workload on each model.

Gemini 4 Carbon
$270 /mo
Claude Opus 5.5
$540 /mo

Monthly = daily × 30. Discounted rates applied where a promotion is active.

FAQ

Which is cheaper: Claude Opus 5.5, Gemini 4 Carbon?

Gemini 4 Carbon: $10/M output tokens; Claude Opus 5.5: $20/M. Use the cost calculator above to estimate your own workload.

How do their coding arena scores compare?

Gemini 4 Carbon: 1567; Claude Opus 5.5: 1546 (LMArena coding leaderboard).

Which responds faster?

Claude Opus 5.5: 0.9s time to first token measured on AIHubMix; see the live performance charts above for how each model behaves across the day.

How large is each context window?

Claude Opus 5.5 accepts 1,000,000 and Gemini 4 Carbon accepts 1,048,576 input tokens. Maximum output per request is 128,000 tokens on Claude Opus 5.5 and 65,536 tokens on Gemini 4 Carbon.

Which one generates tokens faster?

Claude Opus 5.5 at 99.7 tok/s and Gemini 4 Carbon at 45.7 tok/s, measured as output throughput on AIHubMix — a separate metric from time to first token.

What inputs and capabilities does each model support?

Claude Opus 5.5 accepts text, image and PDF input; Gemini 4 Carbon accepts text, image, video, audio and PDF input.

Can I call Claude Opus 5.5 and Gemini 4 Carbon with the same API key?

Yes. AIHubMix serves every model on this page behind one OpenAI-compatible endpoint, so switching between them is a one-line change to the model field — no second account, key or SDK.

Popular comparisons

Related model match-ups readers also look at.