← Models

Claude Fable 5.2 vs Gemini 4 Carbon

Compare Claude Fable 5.2 from Anthropic and Gemini 4 Carbon from Google on key metrics including benchmarks, price, context length, and other model features. Access both models and hundreds of others through the AIHubMix API.

AnthropicClaude Fable 5.2GoogleGemini 4 Carbon
Anthropic logo
Claude Fable 5.2
Anthropic · text, image, pdf → text

Claude Fable 5.2 is Anthropic’s multimodal reasoning model for complex coding, deep research, and long-running agent workflows. It supports text and image inputs, with improved reasoning, coding, and visual understanding, and generates output up to 30% faster than Fable 5.1.

Input$8.8 /M
Output$44 /M
Cache read$0.22 /M
Google logo
Gemini 4 Carbon
Google · text, image, video, audio, pdf → text

Gemini 4 Carbon is Google DeepMind’s multimodal model for complex coding, long-running agent workflows, and cybersecurity defense. Building on Gemini 4 Argon, it improves software engineering, vulnerability detection and remediation, multimodal understanding, and execution across challenging, multi-step tasks.

Input$2 /M
Output$10 /M
Cache read$0.1 /M

Pricing & Specifications

Prices are per million tokens. Time to First Token and throughput are rolling averages measured on AIHubMix.

Claude Fable 5.2
Gemini 4 Carbon
Input /M
$8.8
$2
Output /M
$44
$10
Cache read /M
$0.22
$0.1
Context length
1,000,000
1,048,576
Max output
128,000
65,536
Time to First Token
7.7 s
13.4 s
Throughput
88.1 tok/s
75.9 tok/s
Modalities
textimagepdf
textimagevideoaudiopdf
Supported Parameters
API Formats
Released
November 10, 2026
November 11, 2026

Promotional prices show the discounted rate; see each model page for promotion windows.

Activity Past 30 Days

Daily traffic served through AIHubMix — how demand for each model is trending.

claude-fable-5-2gemini-4-carbon

Tokens / day

-

Requests / day

-

Performance Past 3 Days

Measured on real AIHubMix traffic, hourly buckets. Gaps mean no traffic in that hour.

claude-fable-5-2gemini-4-carbon

Throughput (tok/s)

-

TTFT (s)

-

Uptime (%)

-

LMArena Benchmarks

LMArena ratings by capability (Bradley-Terry, commonly called Elo). Higher is better.

WebDev Arena
claude-fable-5-2gemini-4-carbon
16401720180018801960
Overall
17681836
React
17921907
HTML
17501770
Gaming
18571940
Simulations
18621879
Data analytics
16661688

Source: LMArena (arena.ai) leaderboard, imported by AIHubMix. Models without published ratings are omitted per chart.

Cost calculator

Estimate your monthly bill for the same workload on each model.

Gemini 4 Carbon
$270 /mo
Claude Fable 5.2
$1,188 /mo

Monthly = daily × 30. Discounted rates applied where a promotion is active.

FAQ

Which is cheaper: Claude Fable 5.2, Gemini 4 Carbon?

Gemini 4 Carbon: $10/M output tokens; Claude Fable 5.2: $44/M. Use the cost calculator above to estimate your own workload.

Which responds faster?

Claude Fable 5.2: 7.7s time to first token measured on AIHubMix; see the live performance charts above for how each model behaves across the day.

How large is each context window?

Claude Fable 5.2 accepts 1,000,000 and Gemini 4 Carbon accepts 1,048,576 input tokens. Maximum output per request is 128,000 tokens on Claude Fable 5.2 and 65,536 tokens on Gemini 4 Carbon.

Which one generates tokens faster?

Claude Fable 5.2 at 88.1 tok/s and Gemini 4 Carbon at 75.9 tok/s, measured as output throughput on AIHubMix — a separate metric from time to first token.

What inputs and capabilities does each model support?

Claude Fable 5.2 accepts text, image and PDF input; Gemini 4 Carbon accepts text, image, video, audio and PDF input.

Can I call Claude Fable 5.2 and Gemini 4 Carbon with the same API key?

Yes. AIHubMix serves every model on this page behind one OpenAI-compatible endpoint, so switching between them is a one-line change to the model field — no second account, key or SDK.

Popular comparisons

Related model match-ups readers also look at.