MiMo-V2.5-Pro is Xiaomi's most powerful model to date. In areas such as general agent capabilities, complex software engineering, and long-horizon tasks, it can now directly compete with the world's top agent models (Claude Opus 4.6, GPT-5.4). Compared with the previous-generation MiMo-V2-Pro, it achieves an all-around leap forward.
MiMo V2.5 Pro vs Qwen3.8 Max Preview
Compare MiMo V2.5 Pro from Xiaomi and Qwen3.8 Max Preview from Qwen on key metrics including benchmarks, price, context length, and other model features. Access both models and hundreds of others through the AIHubMix API.
MiMo V2.5 ProQwen 3.8 Max Preview(Qwen3.8-Max-Preview) is the latest-generation foundation model in the Qwen family, packing 2.4T parameters and still evolving. Compared with the previous flagship Qwen 3.7 Max, it delivers major gains in core capabilities like Coding and Cowork (professional productivity), with world-leading performance on complex, long-horizon tasks such as full-stack development, data analysis, and Office workflows. Launch offer: Credits are consumed at just 20% of the standard rate, effectively 5× your usage. Limited time only.
Pricing & Specifications
Prices are per million tokens. Time to First Token and throughput are rolling averages measured on AIHubMix.
Promotional prices show the discounted rate; see each model page for promotion windows.
Activity Past 30 Days
Daily traffic served through AIHubMix — how demand for each model is trending.
Tokens / day
Requests / day
Performance Past 3 Days
Measured on real AIHubMix traffic, hourly buckets. Gaps mean no traffic in that hour.
Throughput (tok/s)
TTFT (s)
Uptime (%)
Cost calculator
Estimate your monthly bill for the same workload on each model.
Monthly = daily × 30. Discounted rates applied where a promotion is active.
FAQ
Which is cheaper: MiMo V2.5 Pro, Qwen3.8 Max Preview?
MiMo V2.5 Pro: $0.96/M output tokens; Qwen3.8 Max Preview: $1.014/M. Use the cost calculator above to estimate your own workload.
Which responds faster?
MiMo V2.5 Pro: 1.7s time to first token measured on AIHubMix; see the live performance charts above for how each model behaves across the day.
How large is each context window?
MiMo V2.5 Pro accepts 1,000,000 and Qwen3.8 Max Preview accepts 983,616 input tokens.
Which one generates tokens faster?
Qwen3.8 Max Preview at 48.1 tok/s and MiMo V2.5 Pro at 41.3 tok/s, measured as output throughput on AIHubMix — a separate metric from time to first token.
What inputs and capabilities does each model support?
MiMo V2.5 Pro accepts text input and supports web search; Qwen3.8 Max Preview accepts text and image input and supports tool calling, function calling, structured outputs, web search, long context and thinking.
Can I call MiMo V2.5 Pro and Qwen3.8 Max Preview with the same API key?
Yes. AIHubMix serves every model on this page behind one OpenAI-compatible endpoint, so switching between them is a one-line change to the model field — no second account, key or SDK.
Popular comparisons
Related model match-ups readers also look at.
