Compare Grok 4.5 from Grok and Qwen3 30B A3B from Qwen on key metrics including benchmarks, price, context length, and other model features. Access both models and hundreds of others through the AIHubMix API.
Grok 4.5
Qwen3 30B A3BGrok 4.5 was trained on datasets spanning knowledge in coding, science, engineering, and math. With both intelligent and efficient reasoning, Grok 4.5 excels at real engineering tasks and exceeds comparable leading models at these tasks.
Achieves effective integration of thinking and non-thinking modes, allowing mode switching during conversations. Its reasoning ability matches that of QwQ-32B with a smaller parameter size, and its general capability significantly surpasses Qwen2.5-14B, reaching state-of-the-art (SOTA) levels among industry models of the same scale.
Prices are per million tokens. Time to First Token and throughput are rolling averages measured on AIHubMix.
Promotional prices show the discounted rate; see each model page for promotion windows.
Daily traffic served through AIHubMix — how demand for each model is trending.
Measured on real AIHubMix traffic, hourly buckets. Gaps mean no traffic in that hour.
LMArena ratings by capability (Bradley-Terry, commonly called Elo). Higher is better.
Source: LMArena (arena.ai) leaderboard, imported by AIHubMix. Models without published ratings are omitted per chart.
Estimate your monthly bill for the same workload on each model.
Monthly = daily × 30. Discounted rates applied where a promotion is active.
Qwen3 30B A3B: $1.2/M output tokens; Grok 4.5: $6/M. Use the cost calculator above to estimate your own workload.
Grok 4.5: 1523; Qwen3 30B A3B: 1387 (LMArena coding leaderboard).
Yes. AIHubMix serves every model on this page behind one OpenAI-compatible endpoint, so switching between them is a one-line change to the model field — no second account, key or SDK.
Related model match-ups readers also look at.