Compare Grok 4.5 from Grok and Qwen Flash from Qwen on key metrics including benchmarks, price, context length, and other model features. Access both models and hundreds of others through the AIHubMix API.
Grok 4.5
Qwen FlashGrok 4.5 was trained on datasets spanning knowledge in coding, science, engineering, and math. With both intelligent and efficient reasoning, Grok 4.5 excels at real engineering tasks and exceeds comparable leading models at these tasks.
The model adopts tiered pricing.
Prices are per million tokens. Time to First Token and throughput are rolling averages measured on AIHubMix.
Promotional prices show the discounted rate; see each model page for promotion windows.
Daily traffic served through AIHubMix — how demand for each model is trending.
Measured on real AIHubMix traffic, hourly buckets. Gaps mean no traffic in that hour.
Estimate your monthly bill for the same workload on each model.
Monthly = daily × 30. Discounted rates applied where a promotion is active.
Qwen Flash: $0.2/M output tokens; Grok 4.5: $6/M. Use the cost calculator above to estimate your own workload.
Qwen Flash: 2.0s time to first token measured on AIHubMix; see the live performance charts above for how each model behaves across the day.
Grok 4.5 at 34.2 tok/s and Qwen Flash at 3.8 tok/s, measured as output throughput on AIHubMix — a separate metric from time to first token.
Yes. AIHubMix serves every model on this page behind one OpenAI-compatible endpoint, so switching between them is a one-line change to the model field — no second account, key or SDK.
Related model match-ups readers also look at.