← Models

Grok 4.5 vs MiMo V2.6 Flash

Compare Grok 4.5 from Grok and MiMo V2.6 Flash from Xiaomi on key metrics including benchmarks, price, context length, and other model features. Access both models and hundreds of others through the AIHubMix API.

GrokGrok 4.5XiaomiMiMo V2.6 Flash
Grok logo
Grok 4.5
Grok · text, image → text

Grok 4.5 was trained on datasets spanning knowledge in coding, science, engineering, and math. With both intelligent and efficient reasoning, Grok 4.5 excels at real engineering tasks and exceeds comparable leading models at these tasks.

Input$2 /M
Output$6 /M
Cache read$0.5 /M
Xiaomi logo
MiMo V2.6 Flash
Xiaomi · text, image, video, audio → text

mimo-v2.6-flash is Xiaomi's latest model series. A fully multimodal, highly intelligent, low-cost efficient inference model, it is the best-balanced choice for high-frequency invocations and large-scale tasks in professional office settings.

Input$0.155 /M
Output$0.31 /M
Cache read$0.0031 /M

Pricing & Specifications

Prices are per million tokens. Time to First Token and throughput are rolling averages measured on AIHubMix.

Grok 4.5
MiMo V2.6 Flash
Input /M
$2
$0.155
Output /M
$6
$0.31
Cache read /M
$0.5
$0.0031
Context length
500,000
1,048,576
Max output
500,000
131,072
Time to First Token
2.9 s
6.1 s
Throughput
35.9 tok/s
21.5 tok/s
Modalities
textimage
textimagevideoaudio
Supported Parameters
thinkingtoolsfunction callingstructured outputslong context
API Formats
Released
July 2026
September 22, 2026

Promotional prices show the discounted rate; see each model page for promotion windows.

Activity Past 30 Days

Daily traffic served through AIHubMix — how demand for each model is trending.

grok-4.5mimo-v2.6-flash

Tokens / day

-

Requests / day

-

Performance Past 3 Days

Measured on real AIHubMix traffic, hourly buckets. Gaps mean no traffic in that hour.

grok-4.5mimo-v2.6-flash

Throughput (tok/s)

-

TTFT (s)

-

Uptime (%)

-

LMArena Benchmarks

LMArena ratings by capability (Bradley-Terry, commonly called Elo). Higher is better.

Text
grok-4.5mimo-v2.6-flash
1360142014801540
Overall
14481465
Coding
15101514
Math
14631472
Hard prompts
14751488
Instruction following
14381461
Multi-turn
14451473
Creative writing
13931452
Longer query
14601480
Chinese
15021504
English
14671473
Vision
grok-4.5mimo-v2.6-flash
1220126013001340
Overall
12451279
OCR
12621289
Diagram
12741306
Homework
12781299
WebDev Arena
grok-4.5mimo-v2.6-flash
1500156016201680
Overall
15531637
React
15561651
HTML
15681638
Gaming
15871704
Simulations
15751669
Data analytics
15221553

Source: LMArena (arena.ai) leaderboard, imported by AIHubMix. Models without published ratings are omitted per chart.

Cost calculator

Estimate your monthly bill for the same workload on each model.

MiMo V2.6 Flash
$13.95 /mo
Grok 4.5
$210 /mo

Monthly = daily × 30. Discounted rates applied where a promotion is active.

FAQ

Which is cheaper: Grok 4.5, MiMo V2.6 Flash?

MiMo V2.6 Flash: $0.31/M output tokens; Grok 4.5: $6/M. Use the cost calculator above to estimate your own workload.

How do their coding arena scores compare?

Grok 4.5: 1514; MiMo V2.6 Flash: 1510 (LMArena coding leaderboard).

Which responds faster?

Grok 4.5: 2.9s time to first token measured on AIHubMix; see the live performance charts above for how each model behaves across the day.

How large is each context window?

Grok 4.5 accepts 500,000 and MiMo V2.6 Flash accepts 1,048,576 input tokens. Maximum output per request is 500,000 tokens on Grok 4.5 and 131,072 tokens on MiMo V2.6 Flash.

Which one generates tokens faster?

Grok 4.5 at 35.9 tok/s and MiMo V2.6 Flash at 21.5 tok/s, measured as output throughput on AIHubMix — a separate metric from time to first token.

What inputs and capabilities does each model support?

Grok 4.5 accepts text and image input and supports thinking, tool calling, function calling, structured outputs and long context; MiMo V2.6 Flash accepts text, image, video and audio input.

Can I call Grok 4.5 and MiMo V2.6 Flash with the same API key?

Yes. AIHubMix serves every model on this page behind one OpenAI-compatible endpoint, so switching between them is a one-line change to the model field — no second account, key or SDK.

Popular comparisons

Related model match-ups readers also look at.