Grok 4.5 was trained on datasets spanning knowledge in coding, science, engineering, and math. With both intelligent and efficient reasoning, Grok 4.5 excels at real engineering tasks and exceeds comparable leading models at these tasks.
grok-4.5 vs kimi-k3
Output tokens cost $6.00 per million on grok-4.5 and $15.00 per million on kimi-k3. Input tokens cost $2.00 per million on grok-4.5 and $3.00 per million on kimi-k3. Cached input tokens are billed at $0.50 per million on grok-4.5 and $0.30 per million on kimi-k3. Context windows are 1,000,000 tokens on grok-4.5 and 1,048,576 tokens on kimi-k3. First-token latency measured on AIHubMix is 1.8s on grok-4.5 and 6.8s on kimi-k3. Measured output throughput is 38.4 tokens/s on grok-4.5 and 32.2 tokens/s on kimi-k3. On the LMArena coding leaderboard grok-4.5 scores 1520 and kimi-k3 scores 1531.
Kimi K3 is Kimi’s flagship model for long-horizon coding and end-to-end knowledge work, with a 1M-token context window and industry-leading intelligence.
Specs & Pricing
Prices are per million tokens. Latency and throughput are rolling averages measured on AIHubMix.
Promotional prices show the discounted rate; see each model page for promotion windows.
Usage on AIHubMix last 30 days
Daily traffic served through AIHubMix — how demand for each model is trending.
Tokens / day
Requests / day
Live Performance last 3 days
Measured on real AIHubMix traffic, hourly buckets. Gaps mean no traffic in that hour.
Throughput (TPS)
Latency (s)
Uptime (%)
Arena Scores
LMArena ratings by capability (Bradley-Terry, commonly called Elo). Higher is better.
Source: LMArena (arena.ai) leaderboard, imported by AIHubMix. Models without published ratings are omitted per chart.
Cost Calculator
Estimate your monthly bill for the same workload on each model.
Monthly = daily × 30. Discounted rates applied where a promotion is active.
FAQ
Which is cheaper: grok-4.5, kimi-k3?
grok-4.5: $6.00/M output tokens; kimi-k3: $15.00/M. Use the cost calculator above to estimate your own workload.
How do their coding arena scores compare?
kimi-k3: 1531; grok-4.5: 1520 (LMArena coding leaderboard).
Which responds faster?
grok-4.5: 1.8s first-token latency measured on AIHubMix; see the live performance charts above for how each model behaves across the day.
How large is each context window?
grok-4.5 accepts 1,000,000 and kimi-k3 accepts 1,048,576 input tokens. Maximum output per request is 1,000,000 tokens on grok-4.5 and 1,048,576 tokens on kimi-k3.
Which one generates tokens faster?
grok-4.5 at 38.4 tokens/s and kimi-k3 at 32.2 tokens/s, measured as output throughput on AIHubMix — a separate metric from first-token latency.
What inputs and capabilities does each model support?
grok-4.5 accepts text and image input and supports thinking, tool calling, function calling, structured outputs and long context; kimi-k3 accepts text, image and video input and supports thinking, function calling and structured outputs.
Can I call grok-4.5 and kimi-k3 with the same API key?
Yes. AIHubMix serves every model on this page behind one OpenAI-compatible endpoint, so switching between them is a one-line change to the model field — no second account, key or SDK.
Popular Comparisons
Related model match-ups readers also look at.
