Models

gpt-5.5 vs kimi-k3

Output tokens cost $30.00 per million on gpt-5.5 and $15.00 per million on kimi-k3. Input tokens cost $5.00 per million on gpt-5.5 and $3.00 per million on kimi-k3. Cached input tokens are billed at $0.50 per million on gpt-5.5 and $0.30 per million on kimi-k3. Context windows are 1,050,000 tokens on gpt-5.5 and 1,048,576 tokens on kimi-k3. First-token latency measured on AIHubMix is 5.4s on gpt-5.5 and 6.8s on kimi-k3. Measured output throughput is 49.1 tokens/s on gpt-5.5 and 32.2 tokens/s on kimi-k3. On the LMArena coding leaderboard gpt-5.5 scores 1508 and kimi-k3 scores 1531.

OpenAIgpt-5.5Moonshot AIkimi-k3
OpenAI
gpt-5.5
OpenAI · text, image → text

GPT-5.5 raises the baseline for complex production workflows. It’s a strong fit for coding use cases, tool-heavy agents, grounded assistants, long-context retrieval, product-spec-to-plan workflows, and customer-facing workflows where execution quality and response polish are critical.

Input$5.00 /M
Output$30.00 /M
Moonshot AI
kimi-k3
Moonshot AI · text, image, video → text

Kimi K3 is Kimi’s flagship model for long-horizon coding and end-to-end knowledge work, with a 1M-token context window and industry-leading intelligence.

Input$3.00 /M
Output$15.00 /M

Specs & Pricing

Prices are per million tokens. Latency and throughput are rolling averages measured on AIHubMix.

gpt-5.5
kimi-k3
Input price
$5.00
$3.00
Output price
$30.00
$15.00
Cache read
$0.50
$0.30
Context window
1,050,000
1,048,576
Max output
128,000
1,048,576
Latency (first token)
5.4 s
6.8 s
Throughput
49.1 TPS
32.2 TPS
Modalities
textimage
textimagevideo
Features
thinkingfunction callingstructured outputswebtools
thinkingfunction callingstructured outputs
Endpoints
chat_completions · claude_api · responses

Promotional prices show the discounted rate; see each model page for promotion windows.

Usage on AIHubMix last 30 days

Daily traffic served through AIHubMix — how demand for each model is trending.

gpt-5.5kimi-k3

Tokens / day

-

Requests / day

-

Live Performance last 3 days

Measured on real AIHubMix traffic, hourly buckets. Gaps mean no traffic in that hour.

gpt-5.5kimi-k3

Throughput (TPS)

-

Latency (s)

-

Uptime (%)

-

Arena Scores

LMArena ratings by capability (Bradley-Terry, commonly called Elo). Higher is better.

Text
gpt-5.5kimi-k3
1420146015001540
Overall
14761486
Coding
15081531
Math
14991499
Hard prompts
14951505
Instruction following
14731479
Multi-turn
14801499
Creative writing
14471470
Longer query
14821502
Chinese
15271530
English
14801491

Source: LMArena (arena.ai) leaderboard, imported by AIHubMix. Models without published ratings are omitted per chart.

Cost Calculator

Estimate your monthly bill for the same workload on each model.

kimi-k3
$405 /mo
gpt-5.5
$750 /mo

Monthly = daily × 30. Discounted rates applied where a promotion is active.

FAQ

Which is cheaper: gpt-5.5, kimi-k3?

kimi-k3: $15.00/M output tokens; gpt-5.5: $30.00/M. Use the cost calculator above to estimate your own workload.

How do their coding arena scores compare?

kimi-k3: 1531; gpt-5.5: 1508 (LMArena coding leaderboard).

Which responds faster?

gpt-5.5: 5.4s first-token latency measured on AIHubMix; see the live performance charts above for how each model behaves across the day.

How large is each context window?

gpt-5.5 accepts 1,050,000 and kimi-k3 accepts 1,048,576 input tokens. Maximum output per request is 128,000 tokens on gpt-5.5 and 1,048,576 tokens on kimi-k3.

Which one generates tokens faster?

gpt-5.5 at 49.1 tokens/s and kimi-k3 at 32.2 tokens/s, measured as output throughput on AIHubMix — a separate metric from first-token latency.

What inputs and capabilities does each model support?

gpt-5.5 accepts text and image input and supports thinking, function calling, structured outputs, web search and tool calling; kimi-k3 accepts text, image and video input and supports thinking, function calling and structured outputs.

Can I call gpt-5.5 and kimi-k3 with the same API key?

Yes. AIHubMix serves every model on this page behind one OpenAI-compatible endpoint, so switching between them is a one-line change to the model field — no second account, key or SDK.

Popular Comparisons

Related model match-ups readers also look at.