Models

glm-5.2 vs qwen3.8-2.4t-a95b

Output tokens cost $2.76 per million on glm-5.2 and $6.00 per million on qwen3.8-2.4t-a95b. Input tokens cost $0.79 per million on glm-5.2 and $2.00 per million on qwen3.8-2.4t-a95b. Cached input tokens are billed at $0.20 per million on glm-5.2 and $0.50 per million on qwen3.8-2.4t-a95b. Discounted rates are shown where a promotion is active. Context lengths are 1,000,000 tokens on glm-5.2 and 262,000 tokens on qwen3.8-2.4t-a95b. Time to first token (TTFT) measured on AIHubMix is 0.9s on glm-5.2 and 0.7s on qwen3.8-2.4t-a95b. Measured output throughput is 46.3 tok/s on glm-5.2 and 32.2 tok/s on qwen3.8-2.4t-a95b.

Z.AIglm-5.2Qwenqwen3.8-2.4t-a95b
up to 30% off·00:00–23:59 UTC
Z.AI logo
glm-5.2
Z.AI · text → text

GLM-5.2 is Z.ai’s flagship model for the era of long-horizon tasks. With a truly usable 1M-token context window, it can handle project-level engineering context, execute long-running tasks more reliably, follow engineering standards more consistently, and complete the full development workflow from requirements to multi-platform deployment in a single task.

Input$1.13$0.79 /M
Output$3.94$2.76 /M
Qwen logo
qwen3.8-2.4t-a95b
Qwen · text, image → text

Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B is Alibaba’s most powerful Qwen model to date. It is a 2.4‑trillion‑parameter sparse Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) model with approximately 95 billion active parameters. It is built for autonomous, long‑duration tasks: multi‑day code runs, reproducing research papers, and self‑improvement.

Input$2.00 /M
Output$6.00 /M

Pricing & Specifications

Prices are per million tokens. Time to First Token and throughput are rolling averages measured on AIHubMix.

glm-5.2
qwen3.8-2.4t-a95b
Input /M
$1.13$0.7930%
$2.00
Output /M
$3.94$2.7630%
$6.00
Cache read /M
$0.28$0.2030%
$0.50
Context length
1,000,000
262,000
Max output
128,000
262,000
Time to First Token
0.9 s
0.7 s
Throughput
46.3 tok/s
32.2 tok/s
Modalities
text
textimage
Supported Parameters
thinkingtoolsfunction callingstructured outputs
toolsfunction callingstructured outputsweblong contextthinking
API Formats
chat_completions · claude_api

Promotional prices show the discounted rate; see each model page for promotion windows.

Activity Past 30 Days

Daily traffic served through AIHubMix — how demand for each model is trending.

glm-5.2qwen3.8-2.4t-a95b

Tokens / day

-

Requests / day

-

Performance Past 3 Days

Measured on real AIHubMix traffic, hourly buckets. Gaps mean no traffic in that hour.

glm-5.2qwen3.8-2.4t-a95b

Throughput (tok/s)

-

TTFT (s)

-

Uptime (%)

-

Cost calculator

Estimate your monthly bill for the same workload on each model.

glm-5.2
$127$88.74 /mo
qwen3.8-2.4t-a95b
$210 /mo

Monthly = daily × 30. Discounted rates applied where a promotion is active.

FAQ

Which is cheaper: glm-5.2, qwen3.8-2.4t-a95b?

glm-5.2: $2.76/M output tokens; qwen3.8-2.4t-a95b: $6.00/M. Use the cost calculator above to estimate your own workload.

Which responds faster?

qwen3.8-2.4t-a95b: 0.7s time to first token measured on AIHubMix; see the live performance charts above for how each model behaves across the day.

How large is each context window?

glm-5.2 accepts 1,000,000 and qwen3.8-2.4t-a95b accepts 262,000 input tokens. Maximum output per request is 128,000 tokens on glm-5.2 and 262,000 tokens on qwen3.8-2.4t-a95b.

Which one generates tokens faster?

glm-5.2 at 46.3 tok/s and qwen3.8-2.4t-a95b at 32.2 tok/s, measured as output throughput on AIHubMix — a separate metric from time to first token.

What inputs and capabilities does each model support?

glm-5.2 accepts text input and supports thinking, tool calling, function calling and structured outputs; qwen3.8-2.4t-a95b accepts text and image input and supports tool calling, function calling, structured outputs, web search, long context and thinking.

Can I call glm-5.2 and qwen3.8-2.4t-a95b with the same API key?

Yes. AIHubMix serves every model on this page behind one OpenAI-compatible endpoint, so switching between them is a one-line change to the model field — no second account, key or SDK.

Popular comparisons

Related model match-ups readers also look at.