Models

GLM 5.2 vs Qwen3 Coder Flash

Output tokens cost $3.94 per million on GLM 5.2 and $0.54 per million on Qwen3 Coder Flash. Input tokens cost $1.13 per million on GLM 5.2 and $0.14 per million on Qwen3 Coder Flash. Cached input tokens are billed at $0.28 per million on GLM 5.2 and $0.14 per million on Qwen3 Coder Flash. Context lengths are 1,000,000 tokens on GLM 5.2 and 256,000 tokens on Qwen3 Coder Flash. Time to first token (TTFT) measured on AIHubMix is 1.1s on GLM 5.2 and 1.9s on Qwen3 Coder Flash. Measured output throughput is 36.9 tok/s on GLM 5.2 and 57.5 tok/s on Qwen3 Coder Flash. On the LMArena coding leaderboard GLM 5.2 scores 1505 and Qwen3 Coder Flash scores 1457.

Z.AIGLM 5.2QwenQwen3 Coder Flash
Z.AI logo
GLM 5.2
Z.AI · text → text

GLM-5.2 is Z.ai’s flagship model for the era of long-horizon tasks. With a truly usable 1M-token context window, it can handle project-level engineering context, execute long-running tasks more reliably, follow engineering standards more consistently, and complete the full development workflow from requirements to multi-platform deployment in a single task.

Input$1.13 /M
Output$3.94 /M
Qwen logo
Qwen3 Coder Flash
Qwen · text → text

Qwen3 Coder Flash is Alibaba's fast and cost efficient version of their proprietary Qwen3 Coder Plus. It is a powerful coding agent model specializing in autonomous programming via tool calling and environment interaction, combining coding proficiency with versatile general-purpose abilities.

Input$0.14 /M
Output$0.54 /M

Pricing & Specifications

Prices are per million tokens. Time to First Token and throughput are rolling averages measured on AIHubMix.

GLM 5.2
Qwen3 Coder Flash
Input /M
$1.13
$0.14
Output /M
$3.94
$0.54
Cache read /M
$0.28
$0.14
Context length
1,000,000
256,000
Max output
128,000
65,536
Time to First Token
1.1 s
1.9 s
Throughput
36.9 tok/s
57.5 tok/s
Modalities
text
text
Supported Parameters
thinkingtoolsfunction callingstructured outputs
toolsfunction callingstructured outputs
API Formats
chat_completions · claude_api
Released
June 16, 2026
-

Promotional prices show the discounted rate; see each model page for promotion windows.

Activity Past 30 Days

Daily traffic served through AIHubMix — how demand for each model is trending.

glm-5.2qwen3-coder-flash

Tokens / day

-

Requests / day

-

Performance Past 3 Days

Measured on real AIHubMix traffic, hourly buckets. Gaps mean no traffic in that hour.

glm-5.2qwen3-coder-flash

Throughput (tok/s)

-

TTFT (s)

-

Uptime (%)

-

LMArena Benchmarks

LMArena ratings by capability (Bradley-Terry, commonly called Elo). Higher is better.

Text
glm-5.2qwen3-coder-flash
1340140014601520
Overall
13881470
Coding
14571505
Math
13771475
Hard prompts
14141488
Instruction following
13851462
Multi-turn
13991470
Creative writing
13651450
Longer query
14091479
Chinese
14061516
English
14001477
WebDev Arena
glm-5.2qwen3-coder-flash
12401340144015401640
Overall
12821582
React
12661594
HTML
12911537
Gaming
12651617
Simulations
12661606
Data analytics
12821542

Source: LMArena (arena.ai) leaderboard, imported by AIHubMix. Models without published ratings are omitted per chart.

Cost calculator

Estimate your monthly bill for the same workload on each model.

Qwen3 Coder Flash
$16.32 /mo
GLM 5.2
$127 /mo

Monthly = daily × 30. Discounted rates applied where a promotion is active.

FAQ

Which is cheaper: GLM 5.2, Qwen3 Coder Flash?

Qwen3 Coder Flash: $0.54/M output tokens; GLM 5.2: $3.94/M. Use the cost calculator above to estimate your own workload.

How do their coding arena scores compare?

GLM 5.2: 1505; Qwen3 Coder Flash: 1457 (LMArena coding leaderboard).

Which responds faster?

GLM 5.2: 1.1s time to first token measured on AIHubMix; see the live performance charts above for how each model behaves across the day.

How large is each context window?

GLM 5.2 accepts 1,000,000 and Qwen3 Coder Flash accepts 256,000 input tokens. Maximum output per request is 128,000 tokens on GLM 5.2 and 65,536 tokens on Qwen3 Coder Flash.

Which one generates tokens faster?

Qwen3 Coder Flash at 57.5 tok/s and GLM 5.2 at 36.9 tok/s, measured as output throughput on AIHubMix — a separate metric from time to first token.

What inputs and capabilities does each model support?

GLM 5.2 accepts text input and supports thinking, tool calling, function calling and structured outputs; Qwen3 Coder Flash accepts text input and supports tool calling, function calling and structured outputs.

Can I call GLM 5.2 and Qwen3 Coder Flash with the same API key?

Yes. AIHubMix serves every model on this page behind one OpenAI-compatible endpoint, so switching between them is a one-line change to the model field — no second account, key or SDK.

Popular comparisons

Related model match-ups readers also look at.