Models

GLM 5.2 vs Llama 4 Maverick

Output tokens cost $3.94 per million on GLM 5.2 and $0.20 per million on Llama 4 Maverick. Input tokens cost $1.13 per million on GLM 5.2 and $0.20 per million on Llama 4 Maverick. Cached input tokens are billed at $0.28 per million on GLM 5.2 and $0.20 per million on Llama 4 Maverick. Context lengths are 1,000,000 tokens on GLM 5.2 and 1,048,576 tokens on Llama 4 Maverick. Time to first token (TTFT) measured on AIHubMix is 0.6s on GLM 5.2 and 0.2s on Llama 4 Maverick. Measured output throughput is 45.3 tok/s on GLM 5.2 and 97.8 tok/s on Llama 4 Maverick. On the LMArena coding leaderboard GLM 5.2 scores 1505 and Llama 4 Maverick scores 1373.

Z.AIGLM 5.2LlamaLlama 4 Maverick
Z.AI logo
GLM 5.2
Z.AI · text → text

GLM-5.2 is Z.ai’s flagship model for the era of long-horizon tasks. With a truly usable 1M-token context window, it can handle project-level engineering context, execute long-running tasks more reliably, follow engineering standards more consistently, and complete the full development workflow from requirements to multi-platform deployment in a single task.

Input$1.13 /M
Output$3.94 /M
Llama logo
Llama 4 Maverick
Llama · text, image → text

Llama 4 Maverick is a high-capacity Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) model from Meta, featuring 400B total parameters and 128 experts, while activating an efficient 17B parameters per inference. Engineered for peak performance, it excels at advanced multimodal tasks. Maverick natively supports text and image input, producing multilingual text and code. With a 1-million-token context window and instruction tuning, it is optimized for complex image reasoning and general-purpose assistant-like interactions. Released under the Llama 4 Community License, Maverick is ideal for research and commercial applications demanding state-of-the-art multimodal understanding and high throughput.

Input$0.20 /M
Output$0.20 /M

Pricing & Specifications

Prices are per million tokens. Time to First Token and throughput are rolling averages measured on AIHubMix.

GLM 5.2
Llama 4 Maverick
Input /M
$1.13
$0.20
Output /M
$3.94
$0.20
Cache read /M
$0.28
$0.20
Context length
1,000,000
1,048,576
Max output
128,000
32,000
Time to First Token
0.6 s
0.2 s
Throughput
45.3 tok/s
97.8 tok/s
Modalities
text
textimage
Supported Parameters
thinkingtoolsfunction callingstructured outputs
toolsfunction callingstructured outputs
API Formats
chat_completions · claude_api
Released
June 16, 2026
-

Promotional prices show the discounted rate; see each model page for promotion windows.

Activity Past 30 Days

Daily traffic served through AIHubMix — how demand for each model is trending.

glm-5.2llama-4-maverick

Tokens / day

-

Requests / day

-

Performance Past 3 Days

Measured on real AIHubMix traffic, hourly buckets. Gaps mean no traffic in that hour.

glm-5.2llama-4-maverick

Throughput (tok/s)

-

TTFT (s)

-

Uptime (%)

-

LMArena Benchmarks

LMArena ratings by capability (Bradley-Terry, commonly called Elo). Higher is better.

Text
glm-5.2llama-4-maverick
1280136014401520
Overall
13271470
Coding
13731505
Math
13191475
Hard prompts
13381488
Instruction following
13141462
Multi-turn
13241470
Creative writing
13071450
Longer query
13341479
Chinese
13301516
English
13401477

Source: LMArena (arena.ai) leaderboard, imported by AIHubMix. Models without published ratings are omitted per chart.

Cost calculator

Estimate your monthly bill for the same workload on each model.

Llama 4 Maverick
$15.00 /mo
GLM 5.2
$127 /mo

Monthly = daily × 30. Discounted rates applied where a promotion is active.

FAQ

Which is cheaper: GLM 5.2, Llama 4 Maverick?

Llama 4 Maverick: $0.20/M output tokens; GLM 5.2: $3.94/M. Use the cost calculator above to estimate your own workload.

How do their coding arena scores compare?

GLM 5.2: 1505; Llama 4 Maverick: 1373 (LMArena coding leaderboard).

Which responds faster?

Llama 4 Maverick: 0.2s time to first token measured on AIHubMix; see the live performance charts above for how each model behaves across the day.

How large is each context window?

GLM 5.2 accepts 1,000,000 and Llama 4 Maverick accepts 1,048,576 input tokens. Maximum output per request is 128,000 tokens on GLM 5.2 and 32,000 tokens on Llama 4 Maverick.

Which one generates tokens faster?

Llama 4 Maverick at 97.8 tok/s and GLM 5.2 at 45.3 tok/s, measured as output throughput on AIHubMix — a separate metric from time to first token.

What inputs and capabilities does each model support?

GLM 5.2 accepts text input and supports thinking, tool calling, function calling and structured outputs; Llama 4 Maverick accepts text and image input and supports tool calling, function calling and structured outputs.

Can I call GLM 5.2 and Llama 4 Maverick with the same API key?

Yes. AIHubMix serves every model on this page behind one OpenAI-compatible endpoint, so switching between them is a one-line change to the model field — no second account, key or SDK.

Popular comparisons

Related model match-ups readers also look at.