GLM-5.2 is Z.ai’s flagship model for the era of long-horizon tasks. With a truly usable 1M-token context window, it can handle project-level engineering context, execute long-running tasks more reliably, follow engineering standards more consistently, and complete the full development workflow from requirements to multi-platform deployment in a single task.
GLM 5.2 vs GPT 4o 2024 11-20
Output tokens cost $3.94 per million on GLM 5.2 and $10.00 per million on GPT 4o 2024 11-20. Input tokens cost $1.13 per million on GLM 5.2 and $2.50 per million on GPT 4o 2024 11-20. Cached input tokens are billed at $0.28 per million on GLM 5.2 and $1.25 per million on GPT 4o 2024 11-20. Context lengths are 1,000,000 tokens on GLM 5.2 and 128,000 tokens on GPT 4o 2024 11-20. Time to first token (TTFT) measured on AIHubMix is 0.6s on GLM 5.2 and 0.6s on GPT 4o 2024 11-20. Measured output throughput is 46.0 tok/s on GLM 5.2 and 60.7 tok/s on GPT 4o 2024 11-20. On the LMArena coding leaderboard GLM 5.2 scores 1505 and GPT 4o 2024 11-20 scores 1361.
GLM 5.2The latest version of the GPT-4o model; it is recommended to use this version, as it is currently smarter than the regular 4o.
Pricing & Specifications
Prices are per million tokens. Time to First Token and throughput are rolling averages measured on AIHubMix.
Promotional prices show the discounted rate; see each model page for promotion windows.
Activity Past 30 Days
Daily traffic served through AIHubMix — how demand for each model is trending.
Tokens / day
Requests / day
Performance Past 3 Days
Measured on real AIHubMix traffic, hourly buckets. Gaps mean no traffic in that hour.
Throughput (tok/s)
TTFT (s)
Uptime (%)
LMArena Benchmarks
LMArena ratings by capability (Bradley-Terry, commonly called Elo). Higher is better.
Source: LMArena (arena.ai) leaderboard, imported by AIHubMix. Models without published ratings are omitted per chart.
Cost calculator
Estimate your monthly bill for the same workload on each model.
Monthly = daily × 30. Discounted rates applied where a promotion is active.
FAQ
Which is cheaper: GLM 5.2, GPT 4o 2024 11-20?
GLM 5.2: $3.94/M output tokens; GPT 4o 2024 11-20: $10.00/M. Use the cost calculator above to estimate your own workload.
How do their coding arena scores compare?
GLM 5.2: 1505; GPT 4o 2024 11-20: 1361 (LMArena coding leaderboard).
Which responds faster?
GLM 5.2: 0.6s time to first token measured on AIHubMix; see the live performance charts above for how each model behaves across the day.
How large is each context window?
GLM 5.2 accepts 1,000,000 and GPT 4o 2024 11-20 accepts 128,000 input tokens. Maximum output per request is 128,000 tokens on GLM 5.2 and 16,384 tokens on GPT 4o 2024 11-20.
Which one generates tokens faster?
GPT 4o 2024 11-20 at 60.7 tok/s and GLM 5.2 at 46.0 tok/s, measured as output throughput on AIHubMix — a separate metric from time to first token.
What inputs and capabilities does each model support?
GLM 5.2 accepts text input and supports thinking, tool calling, function calling and structured outputs; GPT 4o 2024 11-20 accepts text and image input.
Can I call GLM 5.2 and GPT 4o 2024 11-20 with the same API key?
Yes. AIHubMix serves every model on this page behind one OpenAI-compatible endpoint, so switching between them is a one-line change to the model field — no second account, key or SDK.
Popular comparisons
Related model match-ups readers also look at.
