Models

Gemini 2.5 Flash vs Step 3.7 Flash

Compare Gemini 2.5 Flash from Google and Step 3.7 Flash from StepFun on key metrics including benchmarks, price, context length, and other model features. Access both models and hundreds of others through the AIHubMix API.

GoogleGemini 2.5 FlashStepFunStep 3.7 Flash
Google logo
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Google · text, image, video, audio, pdf → text

Gemini 2.5 Flash is Google’s best model in terms of both performance and cost efficiency, offering a comprehensive set of capabilities. It is the first Flash model to support visible reasoning, allowing insight into the thought process behind its responses. With its strong price–performance ratio, the model is well suited for large-scale processing, low-latency, high-throughput tasks that require reasoning, as well as agent-based application scenarios.

Input$0.3 /M
Output$2.499 /M
Cache read$0.03 /M
StepFun logo
Step 3.7 Flash
StepFun · text, image, video → text

step-3.7-flash is stepfun's flagship inference model, designed for high-complexity tasks that require deep reasoning and fast execution. It excels at decomposing multi-step problems, performing tool calls, and maintaining consistency across massive datasets. It is the preferred choice for complex workloads such as long-context agents, advanced software engineering, and end-to-end research automation.

Input$0.22 /M
Output$1.32 /M
Cache read$0.044 /M

Pricing & Specifications

Prices are per million tokens. Time to First Token and throughput are rolling averages measured on AIHubMix.

Gemini 2.5 Flash
Step 3.7 Flash
Input /M
$0.3
$0.22
Output /M
$2.499
$1.32
Cache read /M
$0.03
$0.044
Context length
1,048,576
256,000
Max output
65,536
0
Time to First Token
1.4 s
1.4 s
Throughput
95.0 tok/s
32.6 tok/s
Modalities
textimagevideoaudiopdf
textimagevideo
Supported Parameters
toolsfunction callingstructured outputs
API Formats
Released
June 17, 2025
May 29, 2026

Promotional prices show the discounted rate; see each model page for promotion windows.

Activity Past 30 Days

Daily traffic served through AIHubMix — how demand for each model is trending.

gemini-2.5-flashstep-3.7-flash

Tokens / day

-

Requests / day

-

Performance Past 3 Days

Measured on real AIHubMix traffic, hourly buckets. Gaps mean no traffic in that hour.

gemini-2.5-flashstep-3.7-flash

Throughput (tok/s)

-

TTFT (s)

-

Uptime (%)

-

Cost calculator

Estimate your monthly bill for the same workload on each model.

Step 3.7 Flash
$33.00 /mo
Gemini 2.5 Flash
$55.49 /mo

Monthly = daily × 30. Discounted rates applied where a promotion is active.

FAQ

Which is cheaper: Gemini 2.5 Flash, Step 3.7 Flash?

Step 3.7 Flash: $1.32/M output tokens; Gemini 2.5 Flash: $2.499/M. Use the cost calculator above to estimate your own workload.

Which responds faster?

Gemini 2.5 Flash: 1.4s time to first token measured on AIHubMix; see the live performance charts above for how each model behaves across the day.

How large is each context window?

Gemini 2.5 Flash accepts 1,048,576 and Step 3.7 Flash accepts 256,000 input tokens.

Which one generates tokens faster?

Gemini 2.5 Flash at 95.0 tok/s and Step 3.7 Flash at 32.6 tok/s, measured as output throughput on AIHubMix — a separate metric from time to first token.

What inputs and capabilities does each model support?

Gemini 2.5 Flash accepts text, image, video, audio and PDF input and supports tool calling, function calling and structured outputs; Step 3.7 Flash accepts text, image and video input.

Can I call Gemini 2.5 Flash and Step 3.7 Flash with the same API key?

Yes. AIHubMix serves every model on this page behind one OpenAI-compatible endpoint, so switching between them is a one-line change to the model field — no second account, key or SDK.

Popular comparisons

Related model match-ups readers also look at.