Models

Gemini 2.0 Flash Preview Image Generation vs Step 3.7 Flash

Compare Gemini 2.0 Flash Preview Image Generation from Google and Step 3.7 Flash from StepFun on key metrics including benchmarks, price, context length, and other model features. Access both models and hundreds of others through the AIHubMix API.

GoogleGemini 2.0 Flash Preview Image GenerationStepFunStep 3.7 Flash
Google logo
Gemini 2.0 Flash Preview Image Generation
Google · text, image → text

Gemini 2.0 Flash EXP is the official preview version of the drawing model. Compared to Imagen 3.0, Gemini’s image generation is better suited for scenarios that require contextual understanding and reasoning, rather than the pursuit of ultimate artistic performance and visual quality.

Input$0.1 /M
Output$0.4 /M
StepFun logo
Step 3.7 Flash
StepFun · text, image, video → text

step-3.7-flash is stepfun's flagship inference model, designed for high-complexity tasks that require deep reasoning and fast execution. It excels at decomposing multi-step problems, performing tool calls, and maintaining consistency across massive datasets. It is the preferred choice for complex workloads such as long-context agents, advanced software engineering, and end-to-end research automation.

Input$0.22 /M
Output$1.32 /M
Cache read$0.044 /M

Pricing & Specifications

Prices are per million tokens. Time to First Token and throughput are rolling averages measured on AIHubMix.

Gemini 2.0 Flash Preview Image Generation
Step 3.7 Flash
Input /M
$0.1
$0.22
Output /M
$0.4
$1.32
Cache read /M
-
$0.044
Context length
0
256,000
Max output
0
0
Time to First Token
0.5 s
1.4 s
Throughput
200.0 tok/s
32.6 tok/s
Modalities
textimage
textimagevideo
Supported Parameters
API Formats
Released
-
May 29, 2026

Promotional prices show the discounted rate; see each model page for promotion windows.

Activity Past 30 Days

Daily traffic served through AIHubMix — how demand for each model is trending.

gemini-2.0-flash-preview-image-generationstep-3.7-flash

Tokens / day

-

Requests / day

-

Performance Past 3 Days

Measured on real AIHubMix traffic, hourly buckets. Gaps mean no traffic in that hour.

gemini-2.0-flash-preview-image-generationstep-3.7-flash

Throughput (tok/s)

-

TTFT (s)

-

Uptime (%)

-

Cost calculator

Estimate your monthly bill for the same workload on each model.

Gemini 2.0 Flash Preview Image Generation
$12.00 /mo
Step 3.7 Flash
$33.00 /mo

Monthly = daily × 30. Discounted rates applied where a promotion is active.

FAQ

Which is cheaper: Gemini 2.0 Flash Preview Image Generation, Step 3.7 Flash?

Gemini 2.0 Flash Preview Image Generation: $0.4/M output tokens; Step 3.7 Flash: $1.32/M. Use the cost calculator above to estimate your own workload.

Which responds faster?

Gemini 2.0 Flash Preview Image Generation: 0.5s time to first token measured on AIHubMix; see the live performance charts above for how each model behaves across the day.

Which one generates tokens faster?

Gemini 2.0 Flash Preview Image Generation at 200.0 tok/s and Step 3.7 Flash at 32.6 tok/s, measured as output throughput on AIHubMix — a separate metric from time to first token.

What inputs and capabilities does each model support?

Gemini 2.0 Flash Preview Image Generation accepts text and image input; Step 3.7 Flash accepts text, image and video input.

Can I call Gemini 2.0 Flash Preview Image Generation and Step 3.7 Flash with the same API key?

Yes. AIHubMix serves every model on this page behind one OpenAI-compatible endpoint, so switching between them is a one-line change to the model field — no second account, key or SDK.

Popular comparisons

Related model match-ups readers also look at.