← Models

Deepinfra Nvidia Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3b2 vs GLM 5.2

Compare Deepinfra Nvidia Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3b2 from Nvidia and GLM 5.2 from Z.AI on key metrics including benchmarks, price, context length, and other model features. Access both models and hundreds of others through the AIHubMix API.

NvidiaDeepinfra Nvidia Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3b2Z.AIGLM 5.2
Nvidia logo
Deepinfra Nvidia Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3b2
Nvidia · → text

Input$0.066 /M
Output$0.264 /M
Z.AI logo
GLM 5.2
Z.AI · text → text

GLM-5.2 is Z.ai’s flagship model for the era of long-horizon tasks. With a truly usable 1M-token context window, it can handle project-level engineering context, execute long-running tasks more reliably, follow engineering standards more consistently, and complete the full development workflow from requirements to multi-platform deployment in a single task.

Input$1.1268 /M
Output$3.9438 /M
Cache read$0.2817 /M

Pricing & Specifications

Prices are per million tokens. Time to First Token and throughput are rolling averages measured on AIHubMix.

Deepinfra Nvidia Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3b2
GLM 5.2
Input /M
$0.066
$1.1268
Output /M
$0.264
$3.9438
Cache read /M
-
$0.2817
Context length
0
1,000,000
Max output
0
131,072
Time to First Token
1.0 s
0.7 s
Throughput
109.9 tok/s
37.0 tok/s
Modalities
text
Supported Parameters
thinkingtoolsfunction callingstructured outputs
API Formats
chat_completions · claude_api
Released
-
June 16, 2026

Promotional prices show the discounted rate; see each model page for promotion windows.

Activity Past 30 Days

Daily traffic served through AIHubMix — how demand for each model is trending.

deepinfra-nvidia-nemotron-3-nano-30b-a3b2glm-5.2

Tokens / day

-

Requests / day

-

Performance Past 3 Days

Measured on real AIHubMix traffic, hourly buckets. Gaps mean no traffic in that hour.

deepinfra-nvidia-nemotron-3-nano-30b-a3b2glm-5.2

Throughput (tok/s)

-

TTFT (s)

-

Uptime (%)

-

LMArena Benchmarks

LMArena ratings by capability (Bradley-Terry, commonly called Elo). Higher is better.

Text
deepinfra-nvidia-nemotron-3-nano-30b-a3b2glm-5.2
12201300138014601540
Overall
13161472
Coding
13631509
Math
13541476
Hard prompts
13281492
Instruction following
12931465
Multi-turn
12991469
Creative writing
12501451
Longer query
12911482
Chinese
13601517
English
13451480

Source: LMArena (arena.ai) leaderboard, imported by AIHubMix. Models without published ratings are omitted per chart.

Cost calculator

Estimate your monthly bill for the same workload on each model.

Deepinfra Nvidia Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3b2
$7.92 /mo
GLM 5.2
$127 /mo

Monthly = daily × 30. Discounted rates applied where a promotion is active.

FAQ

Which is cheaper: Deepinfra Nvidia Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3b2, GLM 5.2?

Deepinfra Nvidia Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3b2: $0.264/M output tokens; GLM 5.2: $3.9438/M. Use the cost calculator above to estimate your own workload.

How do their coding arena scores compare?

GLM 5.2: 1509; Deepinfra Nvidia Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3b2: 1363 (LMArena coding leaderboard).

Which responds faster?

GLM 5.2: 0.7s time to first token measured on AIHubMix; see the live performance charts above for how each model behaves across the day.

Which one generates tokens faster?

Deepinfra Nvidia Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3b2 at 109.9 tok/s and GLM 5.2 at 37.0 tok/s, measured as output throughput on AIHubMix — a separate metric from time to first token.

Can I call Deepinfra Nvidia Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3b2 and GLM 5.2 with the same API key?

Yes. AIHubMix serves every model on this page behind one OpenAI-compatible endpoint, so switching between them is a one-line change to the model field — no second account, key or SDK.

Popular comparisons

Related model match-ups readers also look at.