Models

Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Kimi K3

Compare Claude Sonnet 4.5 from Anthropic and Kimi K3 from Moonshot AI on key metrics including benchmarks, price, context length, and other model features. Access both models and hundreds of others through the AIHubMix API.

AnthropicClaude Sonnet 4.5Moonshot AIKimi K3
Anthropic logo
Claude Sonnet 4.5
Anthropic · text, image → text

Sonnet 4.5 is the best model in the world for agents, coding, and computer usage. It is also our most accurate and detailed model for long-running tasks, with enhanced knowledge in coding, finance, and cybersecurity. This model supports a thinking parameter to enable thinking requests in Claude mode.

Input$3.30 /M
Output$16.50 /M
Moonshot AI logo
Kimi K3
Moonshot AI · text, image, video → text

Kimi K3 is Kimi’s flagship model for long-horizon coding and end-to-end knowledge work, with a 1M-token context window and industry-leading intelligence.

Input$3.00 /M
Output$15.00 /M

Pricing & Specifications

Prices are per million tokens. Time to First Token and throughput are rolling averages measured on AIHubMix.

Claude Sonnet 4.5
Kimi K3
Input /M
$3.30
$3.00
Output /M
$16.50
$15.00
Cache read /M
$3.30
$0.30
Context length
1,000,000
1,048,576
Max output
64,000
1,048,576
Time to First Token
1.5 s
0.9 s
Throughput
63.5 tok/s
73.1 tok/s
Modalities
textimage
textimagevideo
Supported Parameters
thinkingtoolsfunction callingstructured outputs
thinkingfunction callingstructured outputs
API Formats
Released
-
-

Promotional prices show the discounted rate; see each model page for promotion windows.

Activity Past 30 Days

Daily traffic served through AIHubMix — how demand for each model is trending.

claude-sonnet-4-5kimi-k3

Tokens / day

-

Requests / day

-

Performance Past 3 Days

Measured on real AIHubMix traffic, hourly buckets. Gaps mean no traffic in that hour.

claude-sonnet-4-5kimi-k3

Throughput (tok/s)

-

TTFT (s)

-

Uptime (%)

-

LMArena Benchmarks

LMArena ratings by capability (Bradley-Terry, commonly called Elo). Higher is better.

Text
claude-sonnet-4-5kimi-k3
14001440148015201560
Overall
14551486
Coding
15141531
Math
14281428
Hard prompts
14831505
Instruction following
14631479
Multi-turn
14791499
Creative writing
14541470
Longer query
14841502
Chinese
14811527
English
14691491

Source: LMArena (arena.ai) leaderboard, imported by AIHubMix. Models without published ratings are omitted per chart.

Cost calculator

Estimate your monthly bill for the same workload on each model.

Kimi K3
$405 /mo
Claude Sonnet 4.5
$446 /mo

Monthly = daily × 30. Discounted rates applied where a promotion is active.

FAQ

Which is cheaper: Claude Sonnet 4.5, Kimi K3?

Kimi K3: $15.00/M output tokens; Claude Sonnet 4.5: $16.50/M. Use the cost calculator above to estimate your own workload.

How do their coding arena scores compare?

Kimi K3: 1531; Claude Sonnet 4.5: 1514 (LMArena coding leaderboard).

Which responds faster?

Kimi K3: 0.9s time to first token measured on AIHubMix; see the live performance charts above for how each model behaves across the day.

How large is each context window?

Claude Sonnet 4.5 accepts 1,000,000 and Kimi K3 accepts 1,048,576 input tokens. Maximum output per request is 64,000 tokens on Claude Sonnet 4.5 and 1,048,576 tokens on Kimi K3.

Which one generates tokens faster?

Kimi K3 at 73.1 tok/s and Claude Sonnet 4.5 at 63.5 tok/s, measured as output throughput on AIHubMix — a separate metric from time to first token.

What inputs and capabilities does each model support?

Claude Sonnet 4.5 accepts text and image input and supports thinking, tool calling, function calling and structured outputs; Kimi K3 accepts text, image and video input and supports thinking, function calling and structured outputs.

Can I call Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Kimi K3 with the same API key?

Yes. AIHubMix serves every model on this page behind one OpenAI-compatible endpoint, so switching between them is a one-line change to the model field — no second account, key or SDK.

Popular comparisons

Related model match-ups readers also look at.