Models

Claude Opus 4.8 vs Gemini 2.5 Pro Search

Compare Claude Opus 4.8 from Anthropic and Gemini 2.5 Pro Search from Google on key metrics including benchmarks, price, context length, and other model features. Access both models and hundreds of others through the AIHubMix API.

AnthropicClaude Opus 4.8GoogleGemini 2.5 Pro Search
Anthropic logo
Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic · text, image, pdf → text

Claude Opus 4.8 is Anthropic’s newest and most powerful publicly available model. It is suitable for the most complex tasks. It is Anthropic’s strongest model for complex reasoning, long-horizon agent programming, and highly autonomous work.claude-opus-4-8 does not display thought content by default; you need to set the additional parameter "display": "summarized" to enable it

Input$5 /M
Output$25 /M
Cache read$0.5 /M
Google logo
Gemini 2.5 Pro Search
Google · text, image, video, audio, pdf → text

gemini-2.5-pro-search integrates Google's official search functionality; the search feature will have an additional separate fee log directly incorporated into the scoring, with detailed logs not displayed; this will be fixed and displayed later; only supports OpenAI-compatible formats for invocation, does not support Gemini SDK; for Gemini's native SDK, please set parameters directly using the official search parameters.

Input$1.25 /M
Output$10 /M
Cache read$0.125 /M

Pricing & Specifications

Prices are per million tokens. Time to First Token and throughput are rolling averages measured on AIHubMix.

Claude Opus 4.8
Gemini 2.5 Pro Search
Input /M
$5
$1.25
Output /M
$25
$10
Cache read /M
$0.5
$0.125
Context length
1,000,000
1,048,576
Max output
128,000
65,536
Time to First Token
1.1 s
3.2 s
Throughput
82.6 tok/s
101.3 tok/s
Modalities
textimagepdf
textimagevideoaudiopdf
Supported Parameters
thinkingtoolsfunction callingstructured outputs
thinkingwebtoolsfunction callingstructured outputslong context
API Formats
chat_completions · claude_api
Released
May 28, 2026
June 17, 2025

Promotional prices show the discounted rate; see each model page for promotion windows.

Activity Past 30 Days

Daily traffic served through AIHubMix — how demand for each model is trending.

claude-opus-4-8gemini-2.5-pro-search

Tokens / day

-

Requests / day

-

Performance Past 3 Days

Measured on real AIHubMix traffic, hourly buckets. Gaps mean no traffic in that hour.

claude-opus-4-8gemini-2.5-pro-search

Throughput (tok/s)

-

TTFT (s)

-

Uptime (%)

-

LMArena Benchmarks

LMArena ratings by capability (Bradley-Terry, commonly called Elo). Higher is better.

Text
claude-opus-4-8gemini-2.5-pro-search
1420146015001540
Overall
14461473
Coding
14651527
Math
14421474
Hard prompts
14581503
Instruction following
14391477
Multi-turn
14481495
Creative writing
14441465
Longer query
14571499
Chinese
14901523
English
14481480
Vision
claude-opus-4-8gemini-2.5-pro-search
1220126013001340
Overall
12461279
OCR
12571294
Diagram
12651309
Homework
12721320
WebDev Arena
claude-opus-4-8gemini-2.5-pro-search
1180130014201540
Overall
12041540
React
15411541
HTML
12121527
Gaming
15731573
Simulations
15441544
Data analytics
15021502

Source: LMArena (arena.ai) leaderboard, imported by AIHubMix. Models without published ratings are omitted per chart.

Cost calculator

Estimate your monthly bill for the same workload on each model.

Gemini 2.5 Pro Search
$225 /mo
Claude Opus 4.8
$675 /mo

Monthly = daily × 30. Discounted rates applied where a promotion is active.

FAQ

Which is cheaper: Claude Opus 4.8, Gemini 2.5 Pro Search?

Gemini 2.5 Pro Search: $10/M output tokens; Claude Opus 4.8: $25/M. Use the cost calculator above to estimate your own workload.

How do their coding arena scores compare?

Claude Opus 4.8: 1527; Gemini 2.5 Pro Search: 1465 (LMArena coding leaderboard).

Which responds faster?

Claude Opus 4.8: 1.1s time to first token measured on AIHubMix; see the live performance charts above for how each model behaves across the day.

How large is each context window?

Claude Opus 4.8 accepts 1,000,000 and Gemini 2.5 Pro Search accepts 1,048,576 input tokens. Maximum output per request is 128,000 tokens on Claude Opus 4.8 and 65,536 tokens on Gemini 2.5 Pro Search.

Which one generates tokens faster?

Gemini 2.5 Pro Search at 101.3 tok/s and Claude Opus 4.8 at 82.6 tok/s, measured as output throughput on AIHubMix — a separate metric from time to first token.

What inputs and capabilities does each model support?

Claude Opus 4.8 accepts text, image and PDF input and supports thinking, tool calling, function calling and structured outputs; Gemini 2.5 Pro Search accepts text, image, video, audio and PDF input and supports thinking, web search, tool calling, function calling, structured outputs and long context.

Can I call Claude Opus 4.8 and Gemini 2.5 Pro Search with the same API key?

Yes. AIHubMix serves every model on this page behind one OpenAI-compatible endpoint, so switching between them is a one-line change to the model field — no second account, key or SDK.

Popular comparisons

Related model match-ups readers also look at.