Claude Opus 4.8 is Anthropic’s newest and most powerful publicly available model. It is suitable for the most complex tasks. It is Anthropic’s strongest model for complex reasoning, long-horizon agent programming, and highly autonomous work.claude-opus-4-8 does not display thought content by default; you need to set the additional parameter "display": "summarized" to enable it
Claude Opus 4.8 vs Gemini 2.5 Pro
Compare Claude Opus 4.8 from Anthropic and Gemini 2.5 Pro from Google on key metrics including benchmarks, price, context length, and other model features. Access both models and hundreds of others through the AIHubMix API.
Gemini 2.5 Pro is an advanced reasoning model developed by Google, optimized for solving highly complex problems across multiple domains. It can deeply understand large-scale information from diverse sources, including text, audio, images, video, and even entire codebases. The model demonstrates strong reasoning capabilities in coding, mathematics, and STEM-related tasks, and supports long-context analysis for large datasets, codebases, and technical documentation.
Pricing & Specifications
Prices are per million tokens. Time to First Token and throughput are rolling averages measured on AIHubMix.
Promotional prices show the discounted rate; see each model page for promotion windows.
Activity Past 30 Days
Daily traffic served through AIHubMix — how demand for each model is trending.
Tokens / day
Requests / day
Performance Past 3 Days
Measured on real AIHubMix traffic, hourly buckets. Gaps mean no traffic in that hour.
Throughput (tok/s)
TTFT (s)
Uptime (%)
LMArena Benchmarks
LMArena ratings by capability (Bradley-Terry, commonly called Elo). Higher is better.
Source: LMArena (arena.ai) leaderboard, imported by AIHubMix. Models without published ratings are omitted per chart.
Cost calculator
Estimate your monthly bill for the same workload on each model.
Monthly = daily × 30. Discounted rates applied where a promotion is active.
FAQ
Which is cheaper: Claude Opus 4.8, Gemini 2.5 Pro?
Gemini 2.5 Pro: $10/M output tokens; Claude Opus 4.8: $25/M. Use the cost calculator above to estimate your own workload.
How do their coding arena scores compare?
Claude Opus 4.8: 1527; Gemini 2.5 Pro: 1465 (LMArena coding leaderboard).
Which responds faster?
Claude Opus 4.8: 1.1s time to first token measured on AIHubMix; see the live performance charts above for how each model behaves across the day.
How large is each context window?
Claude Opus 4.8 accepts 1,000,000 and Gemini 2.5 Pro accepts 1,048,576 input tokens. Maximum output per request is 128,000 tokens on Claude Opus 4.8 and 65,536 tokens on Gemini 2.5 Pro.
Which one generates tokens faster?
Claude Opus 4.8 at 82.6 tok/s and Gemini 2.5 Pro at 68.5 tok/s, measured as output throughput on AIHubMix — a separate metric from time to first token.
What inputs and capabilities does each model support?
Claude Opus 4.8 accepts text, image and PDF input and supports thinking, tool calling, function calling and structured outputs; Gemini 2.5 Pro accepts text, image, video, audio and PDF input and supports tool calling, function calling, structured outputs, long context, web search, thinking and deep search.
Can I call Claude Opus 4.8 and Gemini 2.5 Pro with the same API key?
Yes. AIHubMix serves every model on this page behind one OpenAI-compatible endpoint, so switching between them is a one-line change to the model field — no second account, key or SDK.
Popular comparisons
Related model match-ups readers also look at.