Models

Claude Opus 4.8 vs Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite

Compare Claude Opus 4.8 from Anthropic and Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite from Google on key metrics including benchmarks, price, context length, and other model features. Access both models and hundreds of others through the AIHubMix API.

AnthropicClaude Opus 4.8GoogleGemini 2.5 Flash Lite
Anthropic logo
Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic · text, image, pdf → text

Claude Opus 4.8 is Anthropic’s newest and most powerful publicly available model. It is suitable for the most complex tasks. It is Anthropic’s strongest model for complex reasoning, long-horizon agent programming, and highly autonomous work.claude-opus-4-8 does not display thought content by default; you need to set the additional parameter "display": "summarized" to enable it

Input$5 /M
Output$25 /M
Cache read$0.5 /M
Google logo
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite
Google · text, image, video, audio, pdf → text

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is a balanced model from Google, optimized for applications that require low-latency performance. It retains the practical capabilities of the Gemini 2.5 family, including configurable reasoning based on budget, integration with tools such as grounding via Google Search and code execution, multimodal input support, and an ultra-long context window of up to 1 million tokens, delivering a strong balance between efficiency, functionality, and cost.

Input$0.1 /M
Output$0.4 /M
Cache read$0.01 /M

Pricing & Specifications

Prices are per million tokens. Time to First Token and throughput are rolling averages measured on AIHubMix.

Claude Opus 4.8
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite
Input /M
$5
$0.1
Output /M
$25
$0.4
Cache read /M
$0.5
$0.01
Context length
1,000,000
1,048,576
Max output
128,000
65,536
Time to First Token
1.1 s
0.9 s
Throughput
82.6 tok/s
45.9 tok/s
Modalities
textimagepdf
textimagevideoaudiopdf
Supported Parameters
thinkingtoolsfunction callingstructured outputs
toolsfunction callingstructured outputslong context
API Formats
chat_completions · claude_api
Released
May 28, 2026
June 17, 2025

Promotional prices show the discounted rate; see each model page for promotion windows.

Activity Past 30 Days

Daily traffic served through AIHubMix — how demand for each model is trending.

claude-opus-4-8gemini-2.5-flash-lite

Tokens / day

-

Requests / day

-

Performance Past 3 Days

Measured on real AIHubMix traffic, hourly buckets. Gaps mean no traffic in that hour.

claude-opus-4-8gemini-2.5-flash-lite

Throughput (tok/s)

-

TTFT (s)

-

Uptime (%)

-

LMArena Benchmarks

LMArena ratings by capability (Bradley-Terry, commonly called Elo). Higher is better.

Text
claude-opus-4-8gemini-2.5-flash-lite
1380144015001560
Overall
14111473
Coding
14241527
Math
14061474
Hard prompts
14201503
Instruction following
14021477
Multi-turn
14031495
Creative writing
13971465
Longer query
14191499
Chinese
14451523
English
14121480
Vision
claude-opus-4-8gemini-2.5-flash-lite
11801220126013001340
Overall
12141279
OCR
12231294
Diagram
12361309
Homework
12371320

Source: LMArena (arena.ai) leaderboard, imported by AIHubMix. Models without published ratings are omitted per chart.

Cost calculator

Estimate your monthly bill for the same workload on each model.

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite
$12.00 /mo
Claude Opus 4.8
$675 /mo

Monthly = daily × 30. Discounted rates applied where a promotion is active.

FAQ

Which is cheaper: Claude Opus 4.8, Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite?

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite: $0.4/M output tokens; Claude Opus 4.8: $25/M. Use the cost calculator above to estimate your own workload.

How do their coding arena scores compare?

Claude Opus 4.8: 1527; Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite: 1424 (LMArena coding leaderboard).

Which responds faster?

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite: 0.9s time to first token measured on AIHubMix; see the live performance charts above for how each model behaves across the day.

How large is each context window?

Claude Opus 4.8 accepts 1,000,000 and Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite accepts 1,048,576 input tokens. Maximum output per request is 128,000 tokens on Claude Opus 4.8 and 65,536 tokens on Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite.

Which one generates tokens faster?

Claude Opus 4.8 at 82.6 tok/s and Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite at 45.9 tok/s, measured as output throughput on AIHubMix — a separate metric from time to first token.

What inputs and capabilities does each model support?

Claude Opus 4.8 accepts text, image and PDF input and supports thinking, tool calling, function calling and structured outputs; Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite accepts text, image, video, audio and PDF input and supports tool calling, function calling, structured outputs and long context.

Can I call Claude Opus 4.8 and Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite with the same API key?

Yes. AIHubMix serves every model on this page behind one OpenAI-compatible endpoint, so switching between them is a one-line change to the model field — no second account, key or SDK.

Popular comparisons

Related model match-ups readers also look at.