Models

Claude Opus 4.8 vs Gemini 2.0 Flash Preview Image Generation

Compare Claude Opus 4.8 from Anthropic and Gemini 2.0 Flash Preview Image Generation from Google on key metrics including benchmarks, price, context length, and other model features. Access both models and hundreds of others through the AIHubMix API.

AnthropicClaude Opus 4.8GoogleGemini 2.0 Flash Preview Image Generation
Anthropic logo
Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic · text, image, pdf → text

Claude Opus 4.8 is Anthropic’s newest and most powerful publicly available model. It is suitable for the most complex tasks. It is Anthropic’s strongest model for complex reasoning, long-horizon agent programming, and highly autonomous work.claude-opus-4-8 does not display thought content by default; you need to set the additional parameter "display": "summarized" to enable it

Input$5 /M
Output$25 /M
Cache read$0.5 /M
Google logo
Gemini 2.0 Flash Preview Image Generation
Google · text, image → text

Gemini 2.0 Flash EXP is the official preview version of the drawing model. Compared to Imagen 3.0, Gemini’s image generation is better suited for scenarios that require contextual understanding and reasoning, rather than the pursuit of ultimate artistic performance and visual quality.

Input$0.1 /M
Output$0.4 /M

Pricing & Specifications

Prices are per million tokens. Time to First Token and throughput are rolling averages measured on AIHubMix.

Claude Opus 4.8
Gemini 2.0 Flash Preview Image Generation
Input /M
$5
$0.1
Output /M
$25
$0.4
Cache read /M
$0.5
-
Context length
1,000,000
0
Max output
128,000
0
Time to First Token
1.1 s
0.5 s
Throughput
82.6 tok/s
200.0 tok/s
Modalities
textimagepdf
textimage
Supported Parameters
thinkingtoolsfunction callingstructured outputs
API Formats
chat_completions · claude_api
Released
May 28, 2026
-

Promotional prices show the discounted rate; see each model page for promotion windows.

Activity Past 30 Days

Daily traffic served through AIHubMix — how demand for each model is trending.

claude-opus-4-8gemini-2.0-flash-preview-image-generation

Tokens / day

-

Requests / day

-

Performance Past 3 Days

Measured on real AIHubMix traffic, hourly buckets. Gaps mean no traffic in that hour.

claude-opus-4-8gemini-2.0-flash-preview-image-generation

Throughput (tok/s)

-

TTFT (s)

-

Uptime (%)

-

Cost calculator

Estimate your monthly bill for the same workload on each model.

Gemini 2.0 Flash Preview Image Generation
$12.00 /mo
Claude Opus 4.8
$675 /mo

Monthly = daily × 30. Discounted rates applied where a promotion is active.

FAQ

Which is cheaper: Claude Opus 4.8, Gemini 2.0 Flash Preview Image Generation?

Gemini 2.0 Flash Preview Image Generation: $0.4/M output tokens; Claude Opus 4.8: $25/M. Use the cost calculator above to estimate your own workload.

Which responds faster?

Gemini 2.0 Flash Preview Image Generation: 0.5s time to first token measured on AIHubMix; see the live performance charts above for how each model behaves across the day.

Which one generates tokens faster?

Gemini 2.0 Flash Preview Image Generation at 200.0 tok/s and Claude Opus 4.8 at 82.6 tok/s, measured as output throughput on AIHubMix — a separate metric from time to first token.

What inputs and capabilities does each model support?

Claude Opus 4.8 accepts text, image and PDF input and supports thinking, tool calling, function calling and structured outputs; Gemini 2.0 Flash Preview Image Generation accepts text and image input.

Can I call Claude Opus 4.8 and Gemini 2.0 Flash Preview Image Generation with the same API key?

Yes. AIHubMix serves every model on this page behind one OpenAI-compatible endpoint, so switching between them is a one-line change to the model field — no second account, key or SDK.

Popular comparisons

Related model match-ups readers also look at.