Claude Opus 4.8 is Anthropic’s newest and most powerful publicly available model. It is suitable for the most complex tasks. It is Anthropic’s strongest model for complex reasoning, long-horizon agent programming, and highly autonomous work.claude-opus-4-8 does not display thought content by default; you need to set the additional parameter "display": "summarized" to enable it
Claude Opus 4.8 vs Claude Sonnet 4.5 Thinking
Compare Claude Opus 4.8 from Anthropic and Claude Sonnet 4.5 Thinking from Anthropic on key metrics including benchmarks, price, context length, and other model features. Access both models and hundreds of others through the AIHubMix API.
Claude Sonnet 4.5 does not enable reasoning mode by default. To access its deep reasoning capabilities, users would typically need to call the native Claude API. To make this capability available through an OpenAI-compatible interface, the claude-sonnet-4-5-think model is provided with reasoning mode pre-enabled and a default 64k-token context window, allowing it to be called directly via the OpenAI unified API. Claude Sonnet 4.5 Think is a reasoning-focused variant of Claude Sonnet 4.5 designed for advanced tasks that require rigorous reasoning, complex decision-making, and long-chain analysis; aside from its enhanced reasoning mechanism, all other capabilities remain consistent with the standard Claude Sonnet 4.5 model, making it well suited for complex problem decomposition, multi-step planning, and logic-intensive analysis.
Pricing & Specifications
Prices are per million tokens. Time to First Token and throughput are rolling averages measured on AIHubMix.
Promotional prices show the discounted rate; see each model page for promotion windows.
Activity Past 30 Days
Daily traffic served through AIHubMix — how demand for each model is trending.
Tokens / day
Requests / day
Performance Past 3 Days
Measured on real AIHubMix traffic, hourly buckets. Gaps mean no traffic in that hour.
Throughput (tok/s)
TTFT (s)
Uptime (%)
LMArena Benchmarks
LMArena ratings by capability (Bradley-Terry, commonly called Elo). Higher is better.
Source: LMArena (arena.ai) leaderboard, imported by AIHubMix. Models without published ratings are omitted per chart.
Cost calculator
Estimate your monthly bill for the same workload on each model.
Monthly = daily × 30. Discounted rates applied where a promotion is active.
FAQ
Which is cheaper: Claude Opus 4.8, Claude Sonnet 4.5 Thinking?
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Thinking: $16.5/M output tokens; Claude Opus 4.8: $25/M. Use the cost calculator above to estimate your own workload.
How do their coding arena scores compare?
Claude Opus 4.8: 1527; Claude Sonnet 4.5 Thinking: 1520 (LMArena coding leaderboard).
Which responds faster?
Claude Opus 4.8: 1.1s time to first token measured on AIHubMix; see the live performance charts above for how each model behaves across the day.
How large is each context window?
Claude Opus 4.8 accepts 1,000,000 and Claude Sonnet 4.5 Thinking accepts 200,000 input tokens. Maximum output per request is 128,000 tokens on Claude Opus 4.8 and 64,000 tokens on Claude Sonnet 4.5 Thinking.
Which one generates tokens faster?
Claude Opus 4.8 at 82.6 tok/s and Claude Sonnet 4.5 Thinking at 52.0 tok/s, measured as output throughput on AIHubMix — a separate metric from time to first token.
What inputs and capabilities does each model support?
Claude Opus 4.8 accepts text, image and PDF input and supports thinking, tool calling, function calling and structured outputs; Claude Sonnet 4.5 Thinking accepts text, image and PDF input and supports thinking, tool calling, function calling and structured outputs.
Can I call Claude Opus 4.8 and Claude Sonnet 4.5 Thinking with the same API key?
Yes. AIHubMix serves every model on this page behind one OpenAI-compatible endpoint, so switching between them is a one-line change to the model field — no second account, key or SDK.
Popular comparisons
Related model match-ups readers also look at.