← Models

Claude Fable 5 vs GLM 5.3

Compare Claude Fable 5 from Anthropic and GLM 5.3 from Z.AI on key metrics including benchmarks, price, context length, and other model features. Access both models and hundreds of others through the AIHubMix API.

AnthropicClaude Fable 5Z.AIGLM 5.3
Anthropic logo
Claude Fable 5
Anthropic · text, image, pdf → text

Anthropic's most capable widely released model, for the most demanding reasoning and long-horizon agentic work(This model is extremely expensive and is not recommended for casual use.)

Input$11 /M
Output$55 /M
Cache read$1.1 /M
Z.AI logo
GLM 5.3
Z.AI · text → text

GLM-5.3 is Z.AI’s coding and agentic reasoning model, built for complex software engineering, long-running agent tasks, vulnerability analysis, and other demanding workloads. Building on GLM-5.2, it incorporates further post-training improvements to deliver stronger coding performance, better task execution, and greater token efficiency. We currently offer the production-ready GLM-5.3 API with unlimited concurrency, making it well suited for high-throughput workloads, coding agents, and large-scale automation. For a limited time, GLM-5.3 is available at 10% off.

Input$1.1268 /M
Output$3.9438 /M
Cache read$0.2817 /M

Pricing & Specifications

Prices are per million tokens. Time to First Token and throughput are rolling averages measured on AIHubMix.

Claude Fable 5
GLM 5.3
Input /M
$11
$1.1268
Output /M
$55
$3.9438
Cache read /M
$1.1
$0.2817
Context length
1,000,000
1,048,576
Max output
128,000
131,072
Time to First Token
2.4 s
0.8 s
Throughput
68.1 tok/s
48.4 tok/s
Modalities
textimagepdf
text
Supported Parameters
thinkingtoolsfunction callingstructured outputs
thinkingtoolsfunction callingstructured outputs
API Formats
chat_completions · claude_api
Released
June 9, 2026
August 14, 2026

Promotional prices show the discounted rate; see each model page for promotion windows.

Activity Past 30 Days

Daily traffic served through AIHubMix — how demand for each model is trending.

claude-fable-5glm-5.3

Tokens / day

-

Requests / day

-

Performance Past 3 Days

Measured on real AIHubMix traffic, hourly buckets. Gaps mean no traffic in that hour.

claude-fable-5glm-5.3

Throughput (tok/s)

-

TTFT (s)

-

Uptime (%)

-

Cost calculator

Estimate your monthly bill for the same workload on each model.

GLM 5.3
$127 /mo
Claude Fable 5
$1,485 /mo

Monthly = daily × 30. Discounted rates applied where a promotion is active.

FAQ

Which is cheaper: Claude Fable 5, GLM 5.3?

GLM 5.3: $3.9438/M output tokens; Claude Fable 5: $55/M. Use the cost calculator above to estimate your own workload.

Which responds faster?

GLM 5.3: 0.8s time to first token measured on AIHubMix; see the live performance charts above for how each model behaves across the day.

How large is each context window?

Claude Fable 5 accepts 1,000,000 and GLM 5.3 accepts 1,048,576 input tokens. Maximum output per request is 128,000 tokens on Claude Fable 5 and 131,072 tokens on GLM 5.3.

Which one generates tokens faster?

Claude Fable 5 at 68.1 tok/s and GLM 5.3 at 48.4 tok/s, measured as output throughput on AIHubMix — a separate metric from time to first token.

What inputs and capabilities does each model support?

Claude Fable 5 accepts text, image and PDF input and supports thinking, tool calling, function calling and structured outputs; GLM 5.3 accepts text input and supports thinking, tool calling, function calling and structured outputs.

Can I call Claude Fable 5 and GLM 5.3 with the same API key?

Yes. AIHubMix serves every model on this page behind one OpenAI-compatible endpoint, so switching between them is a one-line change to the model field — no second account, key or SDK.

Popular comparisons

Related model match-ups readers also look at.