Qwen3 32B
Qwen · → text
Input$0.16 /M
Output$0.64 /M
← ModelsQwen3 32B
Step 3.7 Flash
Qwen3 32B vs Step 3.7 Flash
Compare Qwen3 32B from Qwen and Step 3.7 Flash from StepFun on key metrics including benchmarks, price, context length, and other model features. Access both models and hundreds of others through the AIHubMix API.
Qwen3 32BStep 3.7 Flash+ Add model · 2/4
Step 3.7 Flash
StepFun · text, image, video → text
step-3.7-flash is stepfun's flagship inference model, designed for high-complexity tasks that require deep reasoning and fast execution. It excels at decomposing multi-step problems, performing tool calls, and maintaining consistency across massive datasets. It is the preferred choice for complex workloads such as long-context agents, advanced software engineering, and end-to-end research automation.
Input$0.22 /M
Output$1.32 /M
Cache read$0.044 /M
Pricing & Specifications
Prices are per million tokens. Time to First Token and throughput are rolling averages measured on AIHubMix.
Qwen3 32B
Step 3.7 Flash
Input /M
$0.16
$0.22
Output /M
$0.64
$1.32
Cache read /M
-
$0.044
Context length
0
256,000
Max output
0
0
Time to First Token
2.0 s
1.4 s
Throughput
93.3 tok/s
32.6 tok/s
Modalities
textimagevideo
Supported Parameters
API Formats
Released
April 2025
May 29, 2026
Promotional prices show the discounted rate; see each model page for promotion windows.
Activity Past 30 Days
Daily traffic served through AIHubMix — how demand for each model is trending.
qwen3-32bstep-3.7-flash
Tokens / day
-
Requests / day
-
Performance Past 3 Days
Measured on real AIHubMix traffic, hourly buckets. Gaps mean no traffic in that hour.
qwen3-32bstep-3.7-flash
Throughput (tok/s)
-
TTFT (s)
-
Uptime (%)
-
Cost calculator
Estimate your monthly bill for the same workload on each model.
Qwen3 32B
$19.20 /mo
Step 3.7 Flash
$33.00 /mo
Monthly = daily × 30. Discounted rates applied where a promotion is active.
FAQ
Which is cheaper: Qwen3 32B, Step 3.7 Flash?
Qwen3 32B: $0.64/M output tokens; Step 3.7 Flash: $1.32/M. Use the cost calculator above to estimate your own workload.
Which responds faster?
Step 3.7 Flash: 1.4s time to first token measured on AIHubMix; see the live performance charts above for how each model behaves across the day.
Which one generates tokens faster?
Qwen3 32B at 93.3 tok/s and Step 3.7 Flash at 32.6 tok/s, measured as output throughput on AIHubMix — a separate metric from time to first token.
Can I call Qwen3 32B and Step 3.7 Flash with the same API key?
Yes. AIHubMix serves every model on this page behind one OpenAI-compatible endpoint, so switching between them is a one-line change to the model field — no second account, key or SDK.
Popular comparisons
Related model match-ups readers also look at.
