Models

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Step 3.7 Flash

Compare Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 from Qwen and Step 3.7 Flash from StepFun on key metrics including benchmarks, price, context length, and other model features. Access both models and hundreds of others through the AIHubMix API.

QwenQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507StepFunStep 3.7 Flash
Qwen logo
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Qwen · text, image → text

The open-source thinking model based on Qwen3 has significantly improved in logical ability, general capability, knowledge enhancement, and creative ability compared to the previous version (Tongyi Qianwen 3-235B-A22B). It is suitable for high-difficulty and strong reasoning scenarios.

Input$0.28 /M
Output$2.8 /M
StepFun logo
Step 3.7 Flash
StepFun · text, image, video → text

step-3.7-flash is stepfun's flagship inference model, designed for high-complexity tasks that require deep reasoning and fast execution. It excels at decomposing multi-step problems, performing tool calls, and maintaining consistency across massive datasets. It is the preferred choice for complex workloads such as long-context agents, advanced software engineering, and end-to-end research automation.

Input$0.22 /M
Output$1.32 /M
Cache read$0.044 /M

Pricing & Specifications

Prices are per million tokens. Time to First Token and throughput are rolling averages measured on AIHubMix.

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Step 3.7 Flash
Input /M
$0.28
$0.22
Output /M
$2.8
$1.32
Cache read /M
-
$0.044
Context length
262,144
256,000
Max output
131,072
0
Time to First Token
0.3 s
1.4 s
Throughput
87.4 tok/s
32.6 tok/s
Modalities
textimage
textimagevideo
Supported Parameters
thinkingtoolsfunction callingstructured outputs
API Formats
Released
July 25, 2025
May 29, 2026

Promotional prices show the discounted rate; see each model page for promotion windows.

Activity Past 30 Days

Daily traffic served through AIHubMix — how demand for each model is trending.

qwen3-235b-a22b-thinking-2507step-3.7-flash

Tokens / day

-

Requests / day

-

Performance Past 3 Days

Measured on real AIHubMix traffic, hourly buckets. Gaps mean no traffic in that hour.

qwen3-235b-a22b-thinking-2507step-3.7-flash

Throughput (tok/s)

-

TTFT (s)

-

Uptime (%)

-

Cost calculator

Estimate your monthly bill for the same workload on each model.

Step 3.7 Flash
$33.00 /mo
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
$58.80 /mo

Monthly = daily × 30. Discounted rates applied where a promotion is active.

FAQ

Which is cheaper: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507, Step 3.7 Flash?

Step 3.7 Flash: $1.32/M output tokens; Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507: $2.8/M. Use the cost calculator above to estimate your own workload.

Which responds faster?

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507: 0.3s time to first token measured on AIHubMix; see the live performance charts above for how each model behaves across the day.

How large is each context window?

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 accepts 262,144 and Step 3.7 Flash accepts 256,000 input tokens.

Which one generates tokens faster?

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 at 87.4 tok/s and Step 3.7 Flash at 32.6 tok/s, measured as output throughput on AIHubMix — a separate metric from time to first token.

What inputs and capabilities does each model support?

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 accepts text and image input and supports thinking, tool calling, function calling and structured outputs; Step 3.7 Flash accepts text, image and video input.

Can I call Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 and Step 3.7 Flash with the same API key?

Yes. AIHubMix serves every model on this page behind one OpenAI-compatible endpoint, so switching between them is a one-line change to the model field — no second account, key or SDK.

Popular comparisons

Related model match-ups readers also look at.