Models

Ling 2.6 Flash (free) vs Step 3.7 Flash

Compare Ling 2.6 Flash (free) from InclusionAI and Step 3.7 Flash from StepFun on key metrics including benchmarks, price, context length, and other model features. Access both models and hundreds of others through the AIHubMix API.

InclusionAILing 2.6 Flash (free)StepFunStep 3.7 Flash
InclusionAI logo
Ling 2.6 Flash (free)
InclusionAI · text → text

Ling-2.6-flash is an efficient instruction-tuned model developed by inclusionAI, with 104B total parameters and 7.4B active parameters. It is built for practical agent scenarios where low latency, reliable execution, and token efficiency matter. In tasks like coding, document understanding, and lightweight agent workflows, it offers competitive performance for its size while using noticeably fewer tokens, making it well-suited for cost-sensitive and high-throughput applications.

Input$2 /M
Output$2 /M
StepFun logo
Step 3.7 Flash
StepFun · text, image, video → text

step-3.7-flash is stepfun's flagship inference model, designed for high-complexity tasks that require deep reasoning and fast execution. It excels at decomposing multi-step problems, performing tool calls, and maintaining consistency across massive datasets. It is the preferred choice for complex workloads such as long-context agents, advanced software engineering, and end-to-end research automation.

Input$0.22 /M
Output$1.32 /M
Cache read$0.044 /M

Pricing & Specifications

Prices are per million tokens. Time to First Token and throughput are rolling averages measured on AIHubMix.

Ling 2.6 Flash (free)
Step 3.7 Flash
Input /M
$2
$0.22
Output /M
$2
$1.32
Cache read /M
-
$0.044
Context length
262,100
256,000
Max output
32,000
0
Time to First Token
-
1.4 s
Throughput
-
32.6 tok/s
Modalities
text
textimagevideo
Supported Parameters
long context
API Formats
chat_completions
Released
-
May 29, 2026

Promotional prices show the discounted rate; see each model page for promotion windows.

Activity Past 30 Days

Daily traffic served through AIHubMix — how demand for each model is trending.

ling-2.6-flash-freestep-3.7-flash

Tokens / day

-

Requests / day

-

Performance Past 3 Days

Measured on real AIHubMix traffic, hourly buckets. Gaps mean no traffic in that hour.

ling-2.6-flash-freestep-3.7-flash

Throughput (tok/s)

-

TTFT (s)

-

Uptime (%)

-

Cost calculator

Estimate your monthly bill for the same workload on each model.

Step 3.7 Flash
$33.00 /mo
Ling 2.6 Flash (free)
$150 /mo

Monthly = daily × 30. Discounted rates applied where a promotion is active.

FAQ

Which is cheaper: Ling 2.6 Flash (free), Step 3.7 Flash?

Step 3.7 Flash: $1.32/M output tokens; Ling 2.6 Flash (free): $2/M. Use the cost calculator above to estimate your own workload.

How large is each context window?

Ling 2.6 Flash (free) accepts 262,100 and Step 3.7 Flash accepts 256,000 input tokens.

What inputs and capabilities does each model support?

Ling 2.6 Flash (free) accepts text input and supports long context; Step 3.7 Flash accepts text, image and video input.

Can I call Ling 2.6 Flash (free) and Step 3.7 Flash with the same API key?

Yes. AIHubMix serves every model on this page behind one OpenAI-compatible endpoint, so switching between them is a one-line change to the model field — no second account, key or SDK.

Popular comparisons

Related model match-ups readers also look at.