Models

GPT 5.6 Luna vs inclusionAI/Ling-mini-2.0

Compare GPT 5.6 Luna from OpenAI and inclusionAI/Ling-mini-2.0 from InclusionAI on key metrics including benchmarks, price, context length, and other model features. Access both models and hundreds of others through the AIHubMix API.

OpenAIGPT 5.6 LunaInclusionAIinclusionAI/Ling-mini-2.0
OpenAI logo
GPT 5.6 Luna
OpenAI · text, image → text

GPT-5.6 Luna is designed for cost-sensitive, high-volume workloads. It roughly corresponds to the nano model tier used in earlier GPT-5 families.

Input$0.2 /M
Output$1.2 /M
Cache read$0.02 /M
InclusionAI logo
inclusionAI/Ling-mini-2.0
InclusionAI · text → text

Ling-mini-2.0 is a small-sized, high-performance large language model based on the MoE architecture. It has a total of 16 billion parameters, but only activates 1.4 billion parameters per token (non-embedding 789 million), achieving extremely high generation speed. Thanks to the efficient MoE design and large-scale high-quality training data, despite activating only 1.4 billion parameters, Ling-mini-2.0 still demonstrates top-tier performance on downstream tasks comparable to dense LLMs under 10 billion parameters and even larger-scale MoE models.

Input$0.068 /M
Output$0.272 /M

Pricing & Specifications

Prices are per million tokens. Time to First Token and throughput are rolling averages measured on AIHubMix.

GPT 5.6 Luna
inclusionAI/Ling-mini-2.0
Input /M
$0.2
$0.068
Output /M
$1.2
$0.272
Cache read /M
$0.02
-
Context length
1,050,000
NaN
Max output
128,000
0
Time to First Token
5.0 s
0.5 s
Throughput
47.2 tok/s
8.7 tok/s
Modalities
textimage
text
Supported Parameters
toolsthinkingstructured outputs
toolsfunction callingstructured outputs
API Formats
chat_completions · responses
Released
July 9, 2026
-

Promotional prices show the discounted rate; see each model page for promotion windows.

Activity Past 30 Days

Daily traffic served through AIHubMix — how demand for each model is trending.

gpt-5.6-lunainclusionAI/Ling-mini-2.0

Tokens / day

-

Requests / day

-

Performance Past 3 Days

Measured on real AIHubMix traffic, hourly buckets. Gaps mean no traffic in that hour.

gpt-5.6-lunainclusionAI/Ling-mini-2.0

Throughput (tok/s)

-

TTFT (s)

-

Uptime (%)

-

Cost calculator

Estimate your monthly bill for the same workload on each model.

inclusionAI/Ling-mini-2.0
$8.16 /mo
GPT 5.6 Luna
$30.00 /mo

Monthly = daily × 30. Discounted rates applied where a promotion is active.

FAQ

Which is cheaper: GPT 5.6 Luna, inclusionAI/Ling-mini-2.0?

inclusionAI/Ling-mini-2.0: $0.272/M output tokens; GPT 5.6 Luna: $1.2/M. Use the cost calculator above to estimate your own workload.

Which responds faster?

inclusionAI/Ling-mini-2.0: 0.5s time to first token measured on AIHubMix; see the live performance charts above for how each model behaves across the day.

Which one generates tokens faster?

GPT 5.6 Luna at 47.2 tok/s and inclusionAI/Ling-mini-2.0 at 8.7 tok/s, measured as output throughput on AIHubMix — a separate metric from time to first token.

What inputs and capabilities does each model support?

GPT 5.6 Luna accepts text and image input and supports tool calling, thinking and structured outputs; inclusionAI/Ling-mini-2.0 accepts text input and supports tool calling, function calling and structured outputs.

Can I call GPT 5.6 Luna and inclusionAI/Ling-mini-2.0 with the same API key?

Yes. AIHubMix serves every model on this page behind one OpenAI-compatible endpoint, so switching between them is a one-line change to the model field — no second account, key or SDK.

Popular comparisons

Related model match-ups readers also look at.