Models

GPT-5.2-Codex vs Step 3.7 Flash

Compare GPT-5.2-Codex from OpenAI and Step 3.7 Flash from StepFun on key metrics including benchmarks, price, context length, and other model features. Access both models and hundreds of others through the AIHubMix API.

OpenAIGPT-5.2-CodexStepFunStep 3.7 Flash
OpenAI logo
GPT-5.2-Codex
OpenAI · text, image, pdf → text

GPT-5.2-Codex is an upgraded version of GPT-5.2, optimized for agentic coding tasks in Codex and similar execution environments. The model is specifically enhanced for code generation, modification, refactoring, and automated execution workflows, enabling more efficient participation in multi-step, tool-driven programming processes. GPT-5.2-Codex supports low, medium, high, and xhigh reasoning effort settings, allowing flexible trade-offs between latency, reasoning depth, and token usage depending on task complexity.

Input$1.75 /M
Output$14 /M
Cache read$0.175 /M
StepFun logo
Step 3.7 Flash
StepFun · text, image, video → text

step-3.7-flash is stepfun's flagship inference model, designed for high-complexity tasks that require deep reasoning and fast execution. It excels at decomposing multi-step problems, performing tool calls, and maintaining consistency across massive datasets. It is the preferred choice for complex workloads such as long-context agents, advanced software engineering, and end-to-end research automation.

Input$0.22 /M
Output$1.32 /M
Cache read$0.044 /M

Pricing & Specifications

Prices are per million tokens. Time to First Token and throughput are rolling averages measured on AIHubMix.

GPT-5.2-Codex
Step 3.7 Flash
Input /M
$1.75
$0.22
Output /M
$14
$1.32
Cache read /M
$0.175
$0.044
Context length
400,000
256,000
Max output
128,000
0
Time to First Token
0.7 s
1.4 s
Throughput
81.8 tok/s
32.6 tok/s
Modalities
textimagepdf
textimagevideo
Supported Parameters
thinkingfunction callingstructured outputs
API Formats
Released
December 11, 2025
May 29, 2026

Promotional prices show the discounted rate; see each model page for promotion windows.

Activity Past 30 Days

Daily traffic served through AIHubMix — how demand for each model is trending.

gpt-5.2-codexstep-3.7-flash

Tokens / day

-

Requests / day

-

Performance Past 3 Days

Measured on real AIHubMix traffic, hourly buckets. Gaps mean no traffic in that hour.

gpt-5.2-codexstep-3.7-flash

Throughput (tok/s)

-

TTFT (s)

-

Uptime (%)

-

Cost calculator

Estimate your monthly bill for the same workload on each model.

Step 3.7 Flash
$33.00 /mo
GPT-5.2-Codex
$315 /mo

Monthly = daily × 30. Discounted rates applied where a promotion is active.

FAQ

Which is cheaper: GPT-5.2-Codex, Step 3.7 Flash?

Step 3.7 Flash: $1.32/M output tokens; GPT-5.2-Codex: $14/M. Use the cost calculator above to estimate your own workload.

Which responds faster?

GPT-5.2-Codex: 0.7s time to first token measured on AIHubMix; see the live performance charts above for how each model behaves across the day.

How large is each context window?

GPT-5.2-Codex accepts 400,000 and Step 3.7 Flash accepts 256,000 input tokens.

Which one generates tokens faster?

GPT-5.2-Codex at 81.8 tok/s and Step 3.7 Flash at 32.6 tok/s, measured as output throughput on AIHubMix — a separate metric from time to first token.

What inputs and capabilities does each model support?

GPT-5.2-Codex accepts text, image and PDF input and supports thinking, function calling and structured outputs; Step 3.7 Flash accepts text, image and video input.

Can I call GPT-5.2-Codex and Step 3.7 Flash with the same API key?

Yes. AIHubMix serves every model on this page behind one OpenAI-compatible endpoint, so switching between them is a one-line change to the model field — no second account, key or SDK.

Popular comparisons

Related model match-ups readers also look at.