(This model currently points to the older 0423 version; if you need to request the latest version, you can choose the model deepseek-v4-flash-0731)DeepSeek-V4 features an ultra-long context of one million characters and achieves leading performance domestically and in the open-source domain in agent capabilities, world knowledge, and reasoning.
DeepSeek V4 Flash vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking
Compare DeepSeek V4 Flash from DeepSeek and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking from Qwen on key metrics including benchmarks, price, context length, and other model features. Access both models and hundreds of others through the AIHubMix API.
The Qwen3-VL series’ second-largest MoE model Thinking version offers fast response speed, stronger multimodal understanding and reasoning, visual agent capabilities, and ultra-long context support for long videos and long documents; it features comprehensive upgrades in image/video understanding, spatial perception, and universal recognition abilities, making it capable of handling complex real-world tasks.
Pricing & Specifications
Prices are per million tokens. Time to First Token and throughput are rolling averages measured on AIHubMix.
Promotional prices show the discounted rate; see each model page for promotion windows.
Activity Past 30 Days
Daily traffic served through AIHubMix — how demand for each model is trending.
Tokens / day
Requests / day
Performance Past 3 Days
Measured on real AIHubMix traffic, hourly buckets. Gaps mean no traffic in that hour.
Throughput (tok/s)
TTFT (s)
Uptime (%)
LMArena Benchmarks
LMArena ratings by capability (Bradley-Terry, commonly called Elo). Higher is better.
Source: LMArena (arena.ai) leaderboard, imported by AIHubMix. Models without published ratings are omitted per chart.
Cost calculator
Estimate your monthly bill for the same workload on each model.
Monthly = daily × 30. Discounted rates applied where a promotion is active.
FAQ
Which is cheaper: DeepSeek V4 Flash, Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking?
DeepSeek V4 Flash: $0.284/M output tokens; Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking: $1.028/M. Use the cost calculator above to estimate your own workload.
How do their coding arena scores compare?
DeepSeek V4 Flash: 1483; Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking: 1466 (LMArena coding leaderboard).
Which responds faster?
DeepSeek V4 Flash: 1.0s time to first token measured on AIHubMix; see the live performance charts above for how each model behaves across the day.
How large is each context window?
DeepSeek V4 Flash accepts 1,000,000 and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking accepts 131,072 input tokens. Maximum output per request is 384,000 tokens on DeepSeek V4 Flash and 32,768 tokens on Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking.
Which one generates tokens faster?
DeepSeek V4 Flash at 66.4 tok/s and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking at 41.8 tok/s, measured as output throughput on AIHubMix — a separate metric from time to first token.
What inputs and capabilities does each model support?
DeepSeek V4 Flash accepts text input and supports tool calling, function calling, structured outputs and thinking; Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking accepts text, image and video input and supports thinking, tool calling, function calling and structured outputs.
Can I call DeepSeek V4 Flash and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking with the same API key?
Yes. AIHubMix serves every model on this page behind one OpenAI-compatible endpoint, so switching between them is a one-line change to the model field — no second account, key or SDK.
Popular comparisons
Related model match-ups readers also look at.