Models

Claude Sonnet 4.0 vs Step 3.7 Flash

Compare Claude Sonnet 4.0 from Anthropic and Step 3.7 Flash from StepFun on key metrics including benchmarks, price, context length, and other model features. Access both models and hundreds of others through the AIHubMix API.

AnthropicClaude Sonnet 4.0StepFunStep 3.7 Flash
Anthropic logo
Claude Sonnet 4.0
Anthropic · text, image → text

Claude Sonnet 4 is a significant upgrade to Sonnet 3.7, delivering superior performance in coding and reasoning with enhanced precision and control. Achieving a state-of-the-art 72.7% on SWE-bench, the model expertly balances advanced capability with computational efficiency. Key improvements include more reliable codebase navigation and complex instruction following, making it ideal for a wide range of applications, from routine coding to complex software development projects.

Input$3.3 /M
Output$16.5 /M
StepFun logo
Step 3.7 Flash
StepFun · text, image, video → text

step-3.7-flash is stepfun's flagship inference model, designed for high-complexity tasks that require deep reasoning and fast execution. It excels at decomposing multi-step problems, performing tool calls, and maintaining consistency across massive datasets. It is the preferred choice for complex workloads such as long-context agents, advanced software engineering, and end-to-end research automation.

Input$0.22 /M
Output$1.32 /M
Cache read$0.044 /M

Pricing & Specifications

Prices are per million tokens. Time to First Token and throughput are rolling averages measured on AIHubMix.

Claude Sonnet 4.0
Step 3.7 Flash
Input /M
$3.3
$0.22
Output /M
$16.5
$1.32
Cache read /M
-
$0.044
Context length
1,000,000
256,000
Max output
64,000
0
Time to First Token
2.3 s
1.4 s
Throughput
58.5 tok/s
32.6 tok/s
Modalities
textimage
textimagevideo
Supported Parameters
thinkingtoolsfunction callingstructured outputs
API Formats
Released
-
May 29, 2026

Promotional prices show the discounted rate; see each model page for promotion windows.

Activity Past 30 Days

Daily traffic served through AIHubMix — how demand for each model is trending.

claude-sonnet-4-0step-3.7-flash

Tokens / day

-

Requests / day

-

Performance Past 3 Days

Measured on real AIHubMix traffic, hourly buckets. Gaps mean no traffic in that hour.

claude-sonnet-4-0step-3.7-flash

Throughput (tok/s)

-

TTFT (s)

-

Uptime (%)

-

Cost calculator

Estimate your monthly bill for the same workload on each model.

Step 3.7 Flash
$33.00 /mo
Claude Sonnet 4.0
$446 /mo

Monthly = daily × 30. Discounted rates applied where a promotion is active.

FAQ

Which is cheaper: Claude Sonnet 4.0, Step 3.7 Flash?

Step 3.7 Flash: $1.32/M output tokens; Claude Sonnet 4.0: $16.5/M. Use the cost calculator above to estimate your own workload.

Which responds faster?

Step 3.7 Flash: 1.4s time to first token measured on AIHubMix; see the live performance charts above for how each model behaves across the day.

How large is each context window?

Claude Sonnet 4.0 accepts 1,000,000 and Step 3.7 Flash accepts 256,000 input tokens.

Which one generates tokens faster?

Claude Sonnet 4.0 at 58.5 tok/s and Step 3.7 Flash at 32.6 tok/s, measured as output throughput on AIHubMix — a separate metric from time to first token.

What inputs and capabilities does each model support?

Claude Sonnet 4.0 accepts text and image input and supports thinking, tool calling, function calling and structured outputs; Step 3.7 Flash accepts text, image and video input.

Can I call Claude Sonnet 4.0 and Step 3.7 Flash with the same API key?

Yes. AIHubMix serves every model on this page behind one OpenAI-compatible endpoint, so switching between them is a one-line change to the model field — no second account, key or SDK.

Popular comparisons

Related model match-ups readers also look at.