Models

Claude Opus 4.8 vs Qwen Plus 2025 04-28

Compare Claude Opus 4.8 from Anthropic and Qwen Plus 2025 04-28 from Qwen on key metrics including benchmarks, price, context length, and other model features. Access both models and hundreds of others through the AIHubMix API.

AnthropicClaude Opus 4.8QwenQwen Plus 2025 04-28
Anthropic logo
Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic · text, image, pdf → text

Claude Opus 4.8 is Anthropic’s newest and most powerful publicly available model. It is suitable for the most complex tasks. It is Anthropic’s strongest model for complex reasoning, long-horizon agent programming, and highly autonomous work.claude-opus-4-8 does not display thought content by default; you need to set the additional parameter "display": "summarized" to enable it

Input$5 /M
Output$25 /M
Cache read$0.5 /M
Qwen logo
Qwen Plus 2025 04-28
Qwen · → text

The Qwen3 series Plus model effectively integrates thinking and non-thinking modes, allowing for mode switching during conversations. Its reasoning abilities significantly surpass those of QwQ, and its general capabilities are markedly superior to Qwen2.5-Plus, reaching state-of-the-art (SOTA) levels among models of the same scale. This version is a snapshot model as of April 28, 2025.

Input$0.1126 /M
Output$1.126 /M
Cache read$0.0225 /M

Pricing & Specifications

Prices are per million tokens. Time to First Token and throughput are rolling averages measured on AIHubMix.

Claude Opus 4.8
Qwen Plus 2025 04-28
Input /M
$5
$0.1126
Output /M
$25
$1.126
Cache read /M
$0.5
$0.0225
Context length
1,000,000
0
Max output
128,000
0
Time to First Token
1.1 s
0.4 s
Throughput
82.6 tok/s
10.9 tok/s
Modalities
textimagepdf
Supported Parameters
thinkingtoolsfunction callingstructured outputs
API Formats
chat_completions · claude_api
Released
May 28, 2026
-

Promotional prices show the discounted rate; see each model page for promotion windows.

Activity Past 30 Days

Daily traffic served through AIHubMix — how demand for each model is trending.

claude-opus-4-8qwen-plus-2025-04-28

Tokens / day

-

Requests / day

-

Performance Past 3 Days

Measured on real AIHubMix traffic, hourly buckets. Gaps mean no traffic in that hour.

claude-opus-4-8qwen-plus-2025-04-28

Throughput (tok/s)

-

TTFT (s)

-

Uptime (%)

-

LMArena Benchmarks

LMArena ratings by capability (Bradley-Terry, commonly called Elo). Higher is better.

Text
claude-opus-4-8qwen-plus-2025-04-28
1300138014601540
Overall
13461473
Coding
13801527
Math
13241474
Hard prompts
13531503
Instruction following
13321477
Multi-turn
13531495
Creative writing
13171465
Longer query
13621499
Chinese
13751523
English
13571480

Source: LMArena (arena.ai) leaderboard, imported by AIHubMix. Models without published ratings are omitted per chart.

Cost calculator

Estimate your monthly bill for the same workload on each model.

Qwen Plus 2025 04-28
$23.65 /mo
Claude Opus 4.8
$675 /mo

Monthly = daily × 30. Discounted rates applied where a promotion is active.

FAQ

Which is cheaper: Claude Opus 4.8, Qwen Plus 2025 04-28?

Qwen Plus 2025 04-28: $1.126/M output tokens; Claude Opus 4.8: $25/M. Use the cost calculator above to estimate your own workload.

How do their coding arena scores compare?

Claude Opus 4.8: 1527; Qwen Plus 2025 04-28: 1380 (LMArena coding leaderboard).

Which responds faster?

Qwen Plus 2025 04-28: 0.4s time to first token measured on AIHubMix; see the live performance charts above for how each model behaves across the day.

Which one generates tokens faster?

Claude Opus 4.8 at 82.6 tok/s and Qwen Plus 2025 04-28 at 10.9 tok/s, measured as output throughput on AIHubMix — a separate metric from time to first token.

Can I call Claude Opus 4.8 and Qwen Plus 2025 04-28 with the same API key?

Yes. AIHubMix serves every model on this page behind one OpenAI-compatible endpoint, so switching between them is a one-line change to the model field — no second account, key or SDK.

Popular comparisons

Related model match-ups readers also look at.