Models

Claude Opus 4.8 vs O1

Compare Claude Opus 4.8 from Anthropic and O1 from OpenAI on key metrics including benchmarks, price, context length, and other model features. Access both models and hundreds of others through the AIHubMix API.

AnthropicClaude Opus 4.8OpenAIO1
Anthropic logo
Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic · text, image, pdf → text

Claude Opus 4.8 is Anthropic’s newest and most powerful publicly available model. It is suitable for the most complex tasks. It is Anthropic’s strongest model for complex reasoning, long-horizon agent programming, and highly autonomous work.claude-opus-4-8 does not display thought content by default; you need to set the additional parameter "display": "summarized" to enable it

Input$5 /M
Output$25 /M
Cache read$0.5 /M
OpenAI logo
O1
OpenAI · text → text

OpenAI's most powerful O-series model supports official cache hits that halve the input cost.

Input$15 /M
Output$60 /M
Cache read$7.5 /M

Pricing & Specifications

Prices are per million tokens. Time to First Token and throughput are rolling averages measured on AIHubMix.

Claude Opus 4.8
O1
Input /M
$5
$15
Output /M
$25
$60
Cache read /M
$0.5
$7.5
Context length
1,000,000
200
Max output
128,000
0
Time to First Token
1.1 s
59.9 s
Throughput
82.6 tok/s
103.5 tok/s
Modalities
textimagepdf
text
Supported Parameters
thinkingtoolsfunction callingstructured outputs
thinking
API Formats
chat_completions · claude_api
Released
May 28, 2026
December 5, 2024

Promotional prices show the discounted rate; see each model page for promotion windows.

Activity Past 30 Days

Daily traffic served through AIHubMix — how demand for each model is trending.

claude-opus-4-8o1

Tokens / day

-

Requests / day

-

Performance Past 3 Days

Measured on real AIHubMix traffic, hourly buckets. Gaps mean no traffic in that hour.

claude-opus-4-8o1

Throughput (tok/s)

-

TTFT (s)

-

Uptime (%)

-

LMArena Benchmarks

LMArena ratings by capability (Bradley-Terry, commonly called Elo). Higher is better.

Text
claude-opus-4-8o1
1360142014801540
Overall
14021473
Coding
14331527
Math
14091474
Hard prompts
14181503
Instruction following
14071477
Multi-turn
13861495
Creative writing
13811465
Longer query
14121499
Chinese
14301523
English
14121480
Vision
claude-opus-4-8o1
1160122012801340
Overall
11931279
OCR
12941294
Diagram
13091309
Homework
13201320

Source: LMArena (arena.ai) leaderboard, imported by AIHubMix. Models without published ratings are omitted per chart.

Cost calculator

Estimate your monthly bill for the same workload on each model.

Claude Opus 4.8
$675 /mo
O1
$1,800 /mo

Monthly = daily × 30. Discounted rates applied where a promotion is active.

FAQ

Which is cheaper: Claude Opus 4.8, O1?

Claude Opus 4.8: $25/M output tokens; O1: $60/M. Use the cost calculator above to estimate your own workload.

How do their coding arena scores compare?

Claude Opus 4.8: 1527; O1: 1433 (LMArena coding leaderboard).

Which responds faster?

Claude Opus 4.8: 1.1s time to first token measured on AIHubMix; see the live performance charts above for how each model behaves across the day.

How large is each context window?

Claude Opus 4.8 accepts 1,000,000 and O1 accepts 200 input tokens.

Which one generates tokens faster?

O1 at 103.5 tok/s and Claude Opus 4.8 at 82.6 tok/s, measured as output throughput on AIHubMix — a separate metric from time to first token.

What inputs and capabilities does each model support?

Claude Opus 4.8 accepts text, image and PDF input and supports thinking, tool calling, function calling and structured outputs; O1 accepts text input and supports thinking.

Can I call Claude Opus 4.8 and O1 with the same API key?

Yes. AIHubMix serves every model on this page behind one OpenAI-compatible endpoint, so switching between them is a one-line change to the model field — no second account, key or SDK.

Popular comparisons

Related model match-ups readers also look at.