Models

Claude Opus 4.5 Thinking vs Step 3.7 Flash

Compare Claude Opus 4.5 Thinking from Anthropic and Step 3.7 Flash from StepFun on key metrics including benchmarks, price, context length, and other model features. Access both models and hundreds of others through the AIHubMix API.

AnthropicClaude Opus 4.5 ThinkingStepFunStep 3.7 Flash
Anthropic logo
Claude Opus 4.5 Thinking
Anthropic · text, image, pdf → text

Claude Opus 4.5 does not enable reasoning mode by default. To access its deep reasoning capabilities, users would typically need to call the native Claude API. To make this capability available through an OpenAI-compatible interface, we provide the claude-opus-4-5-think model, which has reasoning mode pre-enabled and a default 32k-token context window, allowing it to be called directly via the OpenAI unified API. Claude Opus 4.5 Think is a reasoning-focused variant of Claude Opus 4.5 designed for advanced tasks that require rigorous reasoning, complex decision-making, and long-chain analysis. Aside from its enhanced reasoning mechanism, all other capabilities remain consistent with the standard Claude Opus 4.5 model, making it well suited for complex engineering problem decomposition, multi-stage planning, and logic-intensive analysis.

Input$5 /M
Output$25 /M
Cache read$0.5 /M
StepFun logo
Step 3.7 Flash
StepFun · text, image, video → text

step-3.7-flash is stepfun's flagship inference model, designed for high-complexity tasks that require deep reasoning and fast execution. It excels at decomposing multi-step problems, performing tool calls, and maintaining consistency across massive datasets. It is the preferred choice for complex workloads such as long-context agents, advanced software engineering, and end-to-end research automation.

Input$0.22 /M
Output$1.32 /M
Cache read$0.044 /M

Pricing & Specifications

Prices are per million tokens. Time to First Token and throughput are rolling averages measured on AIHubMix.

Claude Opus 4.5 Thinking
Step 3.7 Flash
Input /M
$5
$0.22
Output /M
$25
$1.32
Cache read /M
$0.5
$0.044
Context length
200,000
256,000
Max output
64,000
0
Time to First Token
2.0 s
1.4 s
Throughput
49.8 tok/s
32.6 tok/s
Modalities
textimagepdf
textimagevideo
Supported Parameters
thinkingtoolsfunction callingstructured outputs
API Formats
Released
November 24, 2025
May 29, 2026

Promotional prices show the discounted rate; see each model page for promotion windows.

Activity Past 30 Days

Daily traffic served through AIHubMix — how demand for each model is trending.

claude-opus-4-5-thinkstep-3.7-flash

Tokens / day

-

Requests / day

-

Performance Past 3 Days

Measured on real AIHubMix traffic, hourly buckets. Gaps mean no traffic in that hour.

claude-opus-4-5-thinkstep-3.7-flash

Throughput (tok/s)

-

TTFT (s)

-

Uptime (%)

-

Cost calculator

Estimate your monthly bill for the same workload on each model.

Step 3.7 Flash
$33.00 /mo
Claude Opus 4.5 Thinking
$675 /mo

Monthly = daily × 30. Discounted rates applied where a promotion is active.

FAQ

Which is cheaper: Claude Opus 4.5 Thinking, Step 3.7 Flash?

Step 3.7 Flash: $1.32/M output tokens; Claude Opus 4.5 Thinking: $25/M. Use the cost calculator above to estimate your own workload.

Which responds faster?

Step 3.7 Flash: 1.4s time to first token measured on AIHubMix; see the live performance charts above for how each model behaves across the day.

How large is each context window?

Claude Opus 4.5 Thinking accepts 200,000 and Step 3.7 Flash accepts 256,000 input tokens.

Which one generates tokens faster?

Claude Opus 4.5 Thinking at 49.8 tok/s and Step 3.7 Flash at 32.6 tok/s, measured as output throughput on AIHubMix — a separate metric from time to first token.

What inputs and capabilities does each model support?

Claude Opus 4.5 Thinking accepts text, image and PDF input and supports thinking, tool calling, function calling and structured outputs; Step 3.7 Flash accepts text, image and video input.

Can I call Claude Opus 4.5 Thinking and Step 3.7 Flash with the same API key?

Yes. AIHubMix serves every model on this page behind one OpenAI-compatible endpoint, so switching between them is a one-line change to the model field — no second account, key or SDK.

Popular comparisons

Related model match-ups readers also look at.