Kimi-K2-0905 is a large-scale Mixture of Experts (MoE) language model developed by Moonshot AI, with a total of 1 trillion parameters and 32 billion active parameters per forward pass. It supports long-context inference of up to 256k tokens, an expansion from the previous 128k.
Kimi K2 0905 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash
Compare Kimi K2 0905 from Moonshot AI and DeepSeek V4 Flash from DeepSeek on key metrics including benchmarks, price, context length, and other model features. Access both models and hundreds of others through the AIHubMix API.
(This model currently points to the older 0423 version; if you need to request the latest version, you can choose the model deepseek-v4-flash-0731)DeepSeek-V4 features an ultra-long context of one million characters and achieves leading performance domestically and in the open-source domain in agent capabilities, world knowledge, and reasoning.
Pricing & Specifications
Prices are per million tokens. Time to First Token and throughput are rolling averages measured on AIHubMix.
Promotional prices show the discounted rate; see each model page for promotion windows.
Activity Past 30 Days
Daily traffic served through AIHubMix — how demand for each model is trending.
Tokens / day
Requests / day
Performance Past 3 Days
Measured on real AIHubMix traffic, hourly buckets. Gaps mean no traffic in that hour.
Throughput (tok/s)
TTFT (s)
Uptime (%)
LMArena Benchmarks
LMArena ratings by capability (Bradley-Terry, commonly called Elo). Higher is better.
Source: LMArena (arena.ai) leaderboard, imported by AIHubMix. Models without published ratings are omitted per chart.
Cost calculator
Estimate your monthly bill for the same workload on each model.
Monthly = daily × 30. Discounted rates applied where a promotion is active.
FAQ
Which is cheaper: Kimi K2 0905, DeepSeek V4 Flash?
DeepSeek V4 Flash: $0.284/M output tokens; Kimi K2 0905: $2.192/M. Use the cost calculator above to estimate your own workload.
How do their coding arena scores compare?
DeepSeek V4 Flash: 1483; Kimi K2 0905: 1467 (LMArena coding leaderboard).
Which responds faster?
Kimi K2 0905: 0.8s time to first token measured on AIHubMix; see the live performance charts above for how each model behaves across the day.
How large is each context window?
Kimi K2 0905 accepts 262,144 and DeepSeek V4 Flash accepts 1,000,000 input tokens. Maximum output per request is 262,144 tokens on Kimi K2 0905 and 384,000 tokens on DeepSeek V4 Flash.
Which one generates tokens faster?
DeepSeek V4 Flash at 66.5 tok/s and Kimi K2 0905 at 49.0 tok/s, measured as output throughput on AIHubMix — a separate metric from time to first token.
What inputs and capabilities does each model support?
Kimi K2 0905 accepts text input and supports tool calling, function calling and structured outputs; DeepSeek V4 Flash accepts text input and supports tool calling, function calling, structured outputs and thinking.
Can I call Kimi K2 0905 and DeepSeek V4 Flash with the same API key?
Yes. AIHubMix serves every model on this page behind one OpenAI-compatible endpoint, so switching between them is a one-line change to the model field — no second account, key or SDK.
Popular comparisons
Related model match-ups readers also look at.