Models

GLM 5.2 vs Muse Spark 1.3

Compare GLM 5.2 from Z.AI and Muse Spark 1.3 from Meta on key metrics including benchmarks, price, context length, and other model features. Access both models and hundreds of others through the AIHubMix API.

Z.AIGLM 5.2MetaMuse Spark 1.3
Z.AI logo
GLM 5.2
Z.AI · text → text

GLM-5.2 is Z.ai’s flagship model for the era of long-horizon tasks. With a truly usable 1M-token context window, it can handle project-level engineering context, execute long-running tasks more reliably, follow engineering standards more consistently, and complete the full development workflow from requirements to multi-platform deployment in a single task.

Input$1.1268 /M
Output$3.9438 /M
Cache read$0.2817 /M
Meta logo
Muse Spark 1.3
Meta · text, image, audio, video → text

Muse Spark 1.3 is Meta’s multimodal reasoning model, designed for long-running agentic, multi-agent, and complex coding workflows. It can maintain context and task constraints across extended workflows, reconcile conflicting information, and request clarification or confirmation when needed. Compared with Muse Spark 1.2, Muse Spark 1.3 improves efficiency across long-horizon agentic and coding tasks, with fewer unnecessary turns, tool calls, and tokens, while producing more concise outputs.

Input$1.375 /M
Output$4.675 /M
Cache read$0.165 /M

Pricing & Specifications

Prices are per million tokens. Time to First Token and throughput are rolling averages measured on AIHubMix.

GLM 5.2
Muse Spark 1.3
Input /M
$1.1268
$1.375
Output /M
$3.9438
$4.675
Cache read /M
$0.2817
$0.165
Context length
1,000,000
1,000,000
Max output
128,000
1,000,000
Time to First Token
1.2 s
2.7 s
Throughput
37.3 tok/s
90.1 tok/s
Modalities
text
textimageaudiovideo
Supported Parameters
thinkingtoolsfunction callingstructured outputs
thinkingtools
API Formats
chat_completions · claude_api
Released
June 16, 2026
September 3, 2026

Promotional prices show the discounted rate; see each model page for promotion windows.

Activity Past 30 Days

Daily traffic served through AIHubMix — how demand for each model is trending.

glm-5.2muse-spark-1.3

Tokens / day

-

Requests / day

-

Performance Past 3 Days

Measured on real AIHubMix traffic, hourly buckets. Gaps mean no traffic in that hour.

glm-5.2muse-spark-1.3

Throughput (tok/s)

-

TTFT (s)

-

Uptime (%)

-

Cost calculator

Estimate your monthly bill for the same workload on each model.

GLM 5.2
$127 /mo
Muse Spark 1.3
$153 /mo

Monthly = daily × 30. Discounted rates applied where a promotion is active.

FAQ

Which is cheaper: GLM 5.2, Muse Spark 1.3?

GLM 5.2: $3.9438/M output tokens; Muse Spark 1.3: $4.675/M. Use the cost calculator above to estimate your own workload.

Which responds faster?

GLM 5.2: 1.2s time to first token measured on AIHubMix; see the live performance charts above for how each model behaves across the day.

How large is each context window?

GLM 5.2 accepts 1,000,000 and Muse Spark 1.3 accepts 1,000,000 input tokens. Maximum output per request is 128,000 tokens on GLM 5.2 and 1,000,000 tokens on Muse Spark 1.3.

Which one generates tokens faster?

Muse Spark 1.3 at 90.1 tok/s and GLM 5.2 at 37.3 tok/s, measured as output throughput on AIHubMix — a separate metric from time to first token.

What inputs and capabilities does each model support?

GLM 5.2 accepts text input and supports thinking, tool calling, function calling and structured outputs; Muse Spark 1.3 accepts text, image, audio and video input and supports thinking and tool calling.

Can I call GLM 5.2 and Muse Spark 1.3 with the same API key?

Yes. AIHubMix serves every model on this page behind one OpenAI-compatible endpoint, so switching between them is a one-line change to the model field — no second account, key or SDK.

Popular comparisons

Related model match-ups readers also look at.