Models

glm-5.2 vs muse-spark-1.1

Output tokens cost $2.76 per million on glm-5.2 and $4.68 per million on muse-spark-1.1. Input tokens cost $0.79 per million on glm-5.2 and $1.38 per million on muse-spark-1.1. Cached input tokens are billed at $0.20 per million on glm-5.2 and $1.38 per million on muse-spark-1.1. Discounted rates are shown where a promotion is active. Context lengths are 1,000,000 tokens on glm-5.2 and 1,000,000 tokens on muse-spark-1.1. Time to first token (TTFT) measured on AIHubMix is 1.0s on glm-5.2 and 5.9s on muse-spark-1.1. Measured output throughput is 46.1 tok/s on glm-5.2 and 183.7 tok/s on muse-spark-1.1. On the LMArena coding leaderboard glm-5.2 scores 1507 and muse-spark-1.1 scores 1531.

Z.AIglm-5.2Metamuse-spark-1.1
up to 30% off·00:00–23:59 UTC
Z.AI logo
glm-5.2
Z.AI · text → text

GLM-5.2 is Z.ai’s flagship model for the era of long-horizon tasks. With a truly usable 1M-token context window, it can handle project-level engineering context, execute long-running tasks more reliably, follow engineering standards more consistently, and complete the full development workflow from requirements to multi-platform deployment in a single task.

Input$1.13$0.79 /M
Output$3.94$2.76 /M
Meta logo
muse-spark-1.1
Meta · text, image, audio, video → text

Muse Spark 1.1 is a multimodal reasoning model from Meta, built for agentic tasks. It accepts text, images, video, audio, and PDF documents and returns text, with a 1M-token context window.

Input$1.38 /M
Output$4.68 /M

Pricing & Specifications

Prices are per million tokens. Time to First Token and throughput are rolling averages measured on AIHubMix.

glm-5.2
muse-spark-1.1
Input /M
$1.13$0.7930%
$1.38
Output /M
$3.94$2.7630%
$4.68
Cache read /M
$0.28$0.2030%
$1.38
Context length
1,000,000
1,000,000
Max output
128,000
0
Time to First Token
1.0 s
5.9 s
Throughput
46.1 tok/s
183.7 tok/s
Modalities
text
textimageaudiovideo
Supported Parameters
thinkingtoolsfunction callingstructured outputs
thinkingtools
API Formats
chat_completions · claude_api

Promotional prices show the discounted rate; see each model page for promotion windows.

Activity Past 30 Days

Daily traffic served through AIHubMix — how demand for each model is trending.

glm-5.2muse-spark-1.1

Tokens / day

-

Requests / day

-

Performance Past 3 Days

Measured on real AIHubMix traffic, hourly buckets. Gaps mean no traffic in that hour.

glm-5.2muse-spark-1.1

Throughput (tok/s)

-

TTFT (s)

-

Uptime (%)

-

LMArena Benchmarks

LMArena ratings by capability (Bradley-Terry, commonly called Elo). Higher is better.

Text
glm-5.2muse-spark-1.1
1420146015001540
Overall
14701489
Coding
15071531
Math
14761488
Hard prompts
14881509
Instruction following
14641474
Multi-turn
14701497
Creative writing
14461448
Longer query
14781480
Chinese
15211536
English
14791490
WebDev Arena
glm-5.2muse-spark-1.1
1500154015801620
Overall
15371588
React
15301598
HTML
15351542
Gaming
15421620
Simulations
15471612
Data analytics
15301546

Source: LMArena (arena.ai) leaderboard, imported by AIHubMix. Models without published ratings are omitted per chart.

Cost calculator

Estimate your monthly bill for the same workload on each model.

glm-5.2
$127$88.74 /mo
muse-spark-1.1
$153 /mo

Monthly = daily × 30. Discounted rates applied where a promotion is active.

FAQ

Which is cheaper: glm-5.2, muse-spark-1.1?

glm-5.2: $2.76/M output tokens; muse-spark-1.1: $4.68/M. Use the cost calculator above to estimate your own workload.

How do their coding arena scores compare?

muse-spark-1.1: 1531; glm-5.2: 1507 (LMArena coding leaderboard).

Which responds faster?

glm-5.2: 1.0s time to first token measured on AIHubMix; see the live performance charts above for how each model behaves across the day.

How large is each context window?

glm-5.2 accepts 1,000,000 and muse-spark-1.1 accepts 1,000,000 input tokens.

Which one generates tokens faster?

muse-spark-1.1 at 183.7 tok/s and glm-5.2 at 46.1 tok/s, measured as output throughput on AIHubMix — a separate metric from time to first token.

What inputs and capabilities does each model support?

glm-5.2 accepts text input and supports thinking, tool calling, function calling and structured outputs; muse-spark-1.1 accepts text, image, audio and video input and supports thinking and tool calling.

Can I call glm-5.2 and muse-spark-1.1 with the same API key?

Yes. AIHubMix serves every model on this page behind one OpenAI-compatible endpoint, so switching between them is a one-line change to the model field — no second account, key or SDK.

Popular comparisons

Related model match-ups readers also look at.