GLM-5.2 is Z.ai’s flagship model for the era of long-horizon tasks. With a truly usable 1M-token context window, it can handle project-level engineering context, execute long-running tasks more reliably, follow engineering standards more consistently, and complete the full development workflow from requirements to multi-platform deployment in a single task.
glm-5.2 vs muse-glimmer-30b
Output tokens cost $2.76 per million on glm-5.2 and $1.50 per million on muse-glimmer-30b. Input tokens cost $0.79 per million on glm-5.2 and $0.35 per million on muse-glimmer-30b. Cached input tokens are billed at $0.20 per million on glm-5.2 and $0.04 per million on muse-glimmer-30b. Discounted rates are shown where a promotion is active. Context lengths are 1,000,000 tokens on glm-5.2 and 131,000 tokens on muse-glimmer-30b. Time to first token (TTFT) measured on AIHubMix is 1.9s on glm-5.2 and 0.4s on muse-glimmer-30b. Measured output throughput is 48.0 tok/s on glm-5.2 and 42.5 tok/s on muse-glimmer-30b. On the LMArena coding leaderboard glm-5.2 scores 1506 and muse-glimmer-30b scores 1482.
Muse Glimmer 30B is a dense causal language model distilled from Muse Spark, designed for autonomous agent work. It combines multi-step reasoning, robust pattern-based tool invocation, and fault-recovery capabilities, and offers multimodal understanding via a ViT-G/14 perceptual encoder of roughly 1.8 billion parameters, supporting interleaved text and image inputs, a context window of over 131K tokens, and optional inference strength settings (from low to ultra-high). Muse Glimmer is trained on data in over 100 languages, performs strongly for its size on agent benchmarks including MCP Atlas, DeepSearch QA, Gaia2, and SWE-Bench Pro, and is released under the Apache 2.0 license.
Pricing & Specifications
Prices are per million tokens. Time to First Token and throughput are rolling averages measured on AIHubMix.
Promotional prices show the discounted rate; see each model page for promotion windows.
Activity Past 30 Days
Daily traffic served through AIHubMix — how demand for each model is trending.
Tokens / day
Requests / day
Performance Past 3 Days
Measured on real AIHubMix traffic, hourly buckets. Gaps mean no traffic in that hour.
Throughput (tok/s)
TTFT (s)
Uptime (%)
LMArena Benchmarks
LMArena ratings by capability (Bradley-Terry, commonly called Elo). Higher is better.
Source: LMArena (arena.ai) leaderboard, imported by AIHubMix. Models without published ratings are omitted per chart.
Cost calculator
Estimate your monthly bill for the same workload on each model.
Monthly = daily × 30. Discounted rates applied where a promotion is active.
FAQ
Which is cheaper: glm-5.2, muse-glimmer-30b?
muse-glimmer-30b: $1.50/M output tokens; glm-5.2: $2.76/M. Use the cost calculator above to estimate your own workload.
How do their coding arena scores compare?
glm-5.2: 1506; muse-glimmer-30b: 1482 (LMArena coding leaderboard).
Which responds faster?
muse-glimmer-30b: 0.4s time to first token measured on AIHubMix; see the live performance charts above for how each model behaves across the day.
How large is each context window?
glm-5.2 accepts 1,000,000 and muse-glimmer-30b accepts 131,000 input tokens. Maximum output per request is 128,000 tokens on glm-5.2 and 131,000 tokens on muse-glimmer-30b.
Which one generates tokens faster?
glm-5.2 at 48.0 tok/s and muse-glimmer-30b at 42.5 tok/s, measured as output throughput on AIHubMix — a separate metric from time to first token.
What inputs and capabilities does each model support?
glm-5.2 accepts text input and supports thinking, tool calling, function calling and structured outputs; muse-glimmer-30b accepts text and image input and supports thinking and tool calling.
Can I call glm-5.2 and muse-glimmer-30b with the same API key?
Yes. AIHubMix serves every model on this page behind one OpenAI-compatible endpoint, so switching between them is a one-line change to the model field — no second account, key or SDK.
Popular comparisons
Related model match-ups readers also look at.
