GLM-5.2 is Z.ai’s flagship model for the era of long-horizon tasks. With a truly usable 1M-token context window, it can handle project-level engineering context, execute long-running tasks more reliably, follow engineering standards more consistently, and complete the full development workflow from requirements to multi-platform deployment in a single task.
GLM 5.2 vs Kimi K2.6
Compare GLM 5.2 from Z.AI and Kimi K2.6 from Moonshot AI on key metrics including benchmarks, price, context length, and other model features. Access both models and hundreds of others through the AIHubMix API.
GLM 5.2Kimi K2.6 is Kimi's latest and most intelligent model, with stronger and more stable long-range code-writing capabilities, significantly improved instruction-following and self-correction abilities, and support for text, image, and video inputs, thinking and non-thinking modes, as well as dialogue and Agent tasks.The model has a context length of 256k, supports long-form thinking, and excels at deep reasoning.
Pricing & Specifications
Prices are per million tokens. Time to First Token and throughput are rolling averages measured on AIHubMix.
Promotional prices show the discounted rate; see each model page for promotion windows.
Activity Past 30 Days
Daily traffic served through AIHubMix — how demand for each model is trending.
Tokens / day
Requests / day
Performance Past 3 Days
Measured on real AIHubMix traffic, hourly buckets. Gaps mean no traffic in that hour.
Throughput (tok/s)
TTFT (s)
Uptime (%)
LMArena Benchmarks
LMArena ratings by capability (Bradley-Terry, commonly called Elo). Higher is better.
Source: LMArena (arena.ai) leaderboard, imported by AIHubMix. Models without published ratings are omitted per chart.
Cost calculator
Estimate your monthly bill for the same workload on each model.
Monthly = daily × 30. Discounted rates applied where a promotion is active.
FAQ
Which is cheaper: GLM 5.2, Kimi K2.6?
GLM 5.2: $3.94/M output tokens; Kimi K2.6: $4.00/M. Use the cost calculator above to estimate your own workload.
How do their coding arena scores compare?
Kimi K2.6: 1514; GLM 5.2: 1505 (LMArena coding leaderboard).
Which responds faster?
GLM 5.2: 1.1s time to first token measured on AIHubMix; see the live performance charts above for how each model behaves across the day.
How large is each context window?
GLM 5.2 accepts 1,000,000 and Kimi K2.6 accepts 262,144 input tokens. Maximum output per request is 128,000 tokens on GLM 5.2 and 32,768 tokens on Kimi K2.6.
Which one generates tokens faster?
Kimi K2.6 at 43.4 tok/s and GLM 5.2 at 34.2 tok/s, measured as output throughput on AIHubMix — a separate metric from time to first token.
What inputs and capabilities does each model support?
GLM 5.2 accepts text input and supports thinking, tool calling, function calling and structured outputs; Kimi K2.6 accepts text, image and video input and supports thinking, function calling and structured outputs.
Can I call GLM 5.2 and Kimi K2.6 with the same API key?
Yes. AIHubMix serves every model on this page behind one OpenAI-compatible endpoint, so switching between them is a one-line change to the model field — no second account, key or SDK.
Popular comparisons
Related model match-ups readers also look at.
