Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is designed to further optimize the performance and reliability of the Gemini 3 Pro series, offering improved reasoning capabilities, greater token efficiency, and a more robust, factually consistent user experience. It is optimized for software-engineering behaviors and usability, and is also suitable for agent workflows that require precise tool invocation and reliable multi-step execution, enabling stable operation across a variety of real-world scenarios.
gemini-3.1-pro-preview vs qwen3.8-max
Output tokens cost $12.00 per million on gemini-3.1-pro-preview and $5.07 per million on qwen3.8-max. Input tokens cost $2.00 per million on gemini-3.1-pro-preview and $1.69 per million on qwen3.8-max. Cached input tokens are billed at $0.50 per million on gemini-3.1-pro-preview and $0.17 per million on qwen3.8-max. Context windows are 1,000,000 tokens on gemini-3.1-pro-preview and 991,000 tokens on qwen3.8-max. First-token latency measured on AIHubMix is 5.9s on gemini-3.1-pro-preview and 3.5s on qwen3.8-max. Measured output throughput is 79.5 tokens/s on gemini-3.1-pro-preview and 37.1 tokens/s on qwen3.8-max. On the LMArena coding leaderboard gemini-3.1-pro-preview scores 1521 and qwen3.8-max scores 1530.
Qwen 3.8 Max(qwen3.8-max) is Alibaba Cloud’s flagship native vision-language model, built on a 2.4-trillion-parameter Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) architecture and supporting context windows of up to 1 million tokens. It is well suited for complex multimodal understanding, advanced reasoning, software development, agentic workflows, and long-context processing. At a similar price to Qwen3.7-Max, Qwen3.8-Max delivers significant improvements in reasoning, coding, and agent capabilities, with overall performance comparable to today’s leading models.
Specs & Pricing
Prices are per million tokens. Latency and throughput are rolling averages measured on AIHubMix.
Promotional prices show the discounted rate; see each model page for promotion windows.
Usage on AIHubMix last 30 days
Daily traffic served through AIHubMix — how demand for each model is trending.
Tokens / day
Requests / day
Live Performance last 3 days
Measured on real AIHubMix traffic, hourly buckets. Gaps mean no traffic in that hour.
Throughput (TPS)
Latency (s)
Uptime (%)
Arena Scores
LMArena ratings by capability (Bradley-Terry, commonly called Elo). Higher is better.
Source: LMArena (arena.ai) leaderboard, imported by AIHubMix. Models without published ratings are omitted per chart.
Cost Calculator
Estimate your monthly bill for the same workload on each model.
Monthly = daily × 30. Discounted rates applied where a promotion is active.
FAQ
Which is cheaper: gemini-3.1-pro-preview, qwen3.8-max?
qwen3.8-max: $5.07/M output tokens; gemini-3.1-pro-preview: $12.00/M. Use the cost calculator above to estimate your own workload.
How do their coding arena scores compare?
qwen3.8-max: 1530; gemini-3.1-pro-preview: 1521 (LMArena coding leaderboard).
Which responds faster?
qwen3.8-max: 3.5s first-token latency measured on AIHubMix; see the live performance charts above for how each model behaves across the day.
How large is each context window?
gemini-3.1-pro-preview accepts 1,000,000 and qwen3.8-max accepts 991,000 input tokens. Maximum output per request is 64,000 tokens on gemini-3.1-pro-preview and 128,000 tokens on qwen3.8-max.
Which one generates tokens faster?
gemini-3.1-pro-preview at 79.5 tokens/s and qwen3.8-max at 37.1 tokens/s, measured as output throughput on AIHubMix — a separate metric from first-token latency.
What inputs and capabilities does each model support?
gemini-3.1-pro-preview accepts text, image, audio and video input and supports thinking, tool calling, function calling, structured outputs, web search, deep search and long context; qwen3.8-max accepts text input and supports tool calling, function calling, structured outputs, web search, long context and thinking.
Can I call gemini-3.1-pro-preview and qwen3.8-max with the same API key?
Yes. AIHubMix serves every model on this page behind one OpenAI-compatible endpoint, so switching between them is a one-line change to the model field — no second account, key or SDK.
Popular Comparisons
Related model match-ups readers also look at.
