DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 Fast is a high-speed deployment of DeepSeek’s agentic model provided by Wafer, designed for coding, tool use, and high-volume agent workloads. It preserves the capabilities of V4 Flash 0731 while delivering much faster inference. Compared with V4 Pro, it prioritizes latency and execution efficiency.
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 Fast vs GLM 5.2
Output tokens cost $0.56 per million on DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 Fast and $3.94 per million on GLM 5.2. Input tokens cost $0.28 per million on DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 Fast and $1.13 per million on GLM 5.2. Cached input tokens are billed at $0.07 per million on DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 Fast and $0.28 per million on GLM 5.2. Context lengths are 1,000,000 tokens on DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 Fast and 1,000,000 tokens on GLM 5.2. Time to first token (TTFT) measured on AIHubMix is 3.8s on DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 Fast and 0.8s on GLM 5.2. Measured output throughput is 129.4 tok/s on DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 Fast and 44.2 tok/s on GLM 5.2. On the LMArena coding leaderboard DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 Fast scores 1483 and GLM 5.2 scores 1506.
GLM 5.2GLM-5.2 is Z.ai’s flagship model for the era of long-horizon tasks. With a truly usable 1M-token context window, it can handle project-level engineering context, execute long-running tasks more reliably, follow engineering standards more consistently, and complete the full development workflow from requirements to multi-platform deployment in a single task.
Pricing & Specifications
Prices are per million tokens. Time to First Token and throughput are rolling averages measured on AIHubMix.
Promotional prices show the discounted rate; see each model page for promotion windows.
Activity Past 30 Days
Daily traffic served through AIHubMix — how demand for each model is trending.
Tokens / day
Requests / day
Performance Past 3 Days
Measured on real AIHubMix traffic, hourly buckets. Gaps mean no traffic in that hour.
Throughput (tok/s)
TTFT (s)
Uptime (%)
LMArena Benchmarks
LMArena ratings by capability (Bradley-Terry, commonly called Elo). Higher is better.
Source: LMArena (arena.ai) leaderboard, imported by AIHubMix. Models without published ratings are omitted per chart.
Cost calculator
Estimate your monthly bill for the same workload on each model.
Monthly = daily × 30. Discounted rates applied where a promotion is active.
FAQ
Which is cheaper: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 Fast, GLM 5.2?
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 Fast: $0.56/M output tokens; GLM 5.2: $3.94/M. Use the cost calculator above to estimate your own workload.
How do their coding arena scores compare?
GLM 5.2: 1506; DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 Fast: 1483 (LMArena coding leaderboard).
Which responds faster?
GLM 5.2: 0.8s time to first token measured on AIHubMix; see the live performance charts above for how each model behaves across the day.
How large is each context window?
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 Fast accepts 1,000,000 and GLM 5.2 accepts 1,000,000 input tokens. Maximum output per request is 384,000 tokens on DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 Fast and 128,000 tokens on GLM 5.2.
Which one generates tokens faster?
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 Fast at 129.4 tok/s and GLM 5.2 at 44.2 tok/s, measured as output throughput on AIHubMix — a separate metric from time to first token.
What inputs and capabilities does each model support?
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 Fast accepts text input and supports tool calling, function calling, structured outputs and thinking; GLM 5.2 accepts text input and supports thinking, tool calling, function calling and structured outputs.
Can I call DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 Fast and GLM 5.2 with the same API key?
Yes. AIHubMix serves every model on this page behind one OpenAI-compatible endpoint, so switching between them is a one-line change to the model field — no second account, key or SDK.
Popular comparisons
Related model match-ups readers also look at.
