The claude-opus-4-7-think model has adaptive thinking mode pre-enabled; the default thinking intensity is "medium", and it can be invoked directly via the OpenAI unified API. The claude-opus-4-7 model does not display thinking content by default; you need to set the extra parameter "display": "summarized" to enable it.
Claude Opus 4.7 Thinking vs GLM 5.2
Output tokens cost $25.00 per million on Claude Opus 4.7 Thinking and $3.94 per million on GLM 5.2. Input tokens cost $5.00 per million on Claude Opus 4.7 Thinking and $1.13 per million on GLM 5.2. Cached input tokens are billed at $0.50 per million on Claude Opus 4.7 Thinking and $0.28 per million on GLM 5.2. Context lengths are 200,000 tokens on Claude Opus 4.7 Thinking and 1,000,000 tokens on GLM 5.2. Time to first token (TTFT) measured on AIHubMix is 1.6s on Claude Opus 4.7 Thinking and 1.2s on GLM 5.2. Measured output throughput is 89.2 tok/s on Claude Opus 4.7 Thinking and 41.4 tok/s on GLM 5.2. On the LMArena coding leaderboard Claude Opus 4.7 Thinking scores 1547 and GLM 5.2 scores 1505.
GLM 5.2GLM-5.2 is Z.ai’s flagship model for the era of long-horizon tasks. With a truly usable 1M-token context window, it can handle project-level engineering context, execute long-running tasks more reliably, follow engineering standards more consistently, and complete the full development workflow from requirements to multi-platform deployment in a single task.
Pricing & Specifications
Prices are per million tokens. Time to First Token and throughput are rolling averages measured on AIHubMix.
Promotional prices show the discounted rate; see each model page for promotion windows.
Activity Past 30 Days
Daily traffic served through AIHubMix — how demand for each model is trending.
Tokens / day
Requests / day
Performance Past 3 Days
Measured on real AIHubMix traffic, hourly buckets. Gaps mean no traffic in that hour.
Throughput (tok/s)
TTFT (s)
Uptime (%)
LMArena Benchmarks
LMArena ratings by capability (Bradley-Terry, commonly called Elo). Higher is better.
Source: LMArena (arena.ai) leaderboard, imported by AIHubMix. Models without published ratings are omitted per chart.
Cost calculator
Estimate your monthly bill for the same workload on each model.
Monthly = daily × 30. Discounted rates applied where a promotion is active.
FAQ
Which is cheaper: Claude Opus 4.7 Thinking, GLM 5.2?
GLM 5.2: $3.94/M output tokens; Claude Opus 4.7 Thinking: $25.00/M. Use the cost calculator above to estimate your own workload.
How do their coding arena scores compare?
Claude Opus 4.7 Thinking: 1547; GLM 5.2: 1505 (LMArena coding leaderboard).
Which responds faster?
GLM 5.2: 1.2s time to first token measured on AIHubMix; see the live performance charts above for how each model behaves across the day.
How large is each context window?
Claude Opus 4.7 Thinking accepts 200,000 and GLM 5.2 accepts 1,000,000 input tokens. Maximum output per request is 32,000 tokens on Claude Opus 4.7 Thinking and 128,000 tokens on GLM 5.2.
Which one generates tokens faster?
Claude Opus 4.7 Thinking at 89.2 tok/s and GLM 5.2 at 41.4 tok/s, measured as output throughput on AIHubMix — a separate metric from time to first token.
What inputs and capabilities does each model support?
Claude Opus 4.7 Thinking accepts image and text input and supports thinking, tool calling, function calling and structured outputs; GLM 5.2 accepts text input and supports thinking, tool calling, function calling and structured outputs.
Can I call Claude Opus 4.7 Thinking and GLM 5.2 with the same API key?
Yes. AIHubMix serves every model on this page behind one OpenAI-compatible endpoint, so switching between them is a one-line change to the model field — no second account, key or SDK.
Popular comparisons
Related model match-ups readers also look at.
