Models

GPT 5.1 vs Kimi K3

Compare GPT 5.1 from OpenAI and Kimi K3 from Moonshot AI on key metrics including benchmarks, price, context length, and other model features. Access both models and hundreds of others through the AIHubMix API.

OpenAIGPT 5.1Moonshot AIKimi K3
OpenAI logo
GPT 5.1
OpenAI · text, image → text

GPT-5 is OpenAI’s most advanced language model, designed for complex tasks that require step-by-step reasoning, precise instruction following, and high reliability. It improves reasoning, code generation, and prompt understanding—including test-time routing and intent cues like “think hard about this”—while reducing hallucination and sycophancy.

Input$1.25 /M
Output$10.00 /M
Moonshot AI logo
Kimi K3
Moonshot AI · text, image, video → text

Kimi K3 is Kimi’s flagship model for long-horizon coding and end-to-end knowledge work, with a 1M-token context window and industry-leading intelligence.

Input$3.00 /M
Output$15.00 /M

Pricing & Specifications

Prices are per million tokens. Time to First Token and throughput are rolling averages measured on AIHubMix.

GPT 5.1
Kimi K3
Input /M
$1.25
$3.00
Output /M
$10.00
$15.00
Cache read /M
$0.13
$0.30
Context length
400,000
1,048,576
Max output
128,000
1,048,576
Time to First Token
1.0 s
0.9 s
Throughput
83.8 tok/s
73.1 tok/s
Modalities
textimage
textimagevideo
Supported Parameters
thinkingwebtoolsdeepsearchfunction callingstructured outputs
thinkingfunction callingstructured outputs
API Formats
Released
-
-

Promotional prices show the discounted rate; see each model page for promotion windows.

Activity Past 30 Days

Daily traffic served through AIHubMix — how demand for each model is trending.

gpt-5.1kimi-k3

Tokens / day

-

Requests / day

-

Performance Past 3 Days

Measured on real AIHubMix traffic, hourly buckets. Gaps mean no traffic in that hour.

gpt-5.1kimi-k3

Throughput (tok/s)

-

TTFT (s)

-

Uptime (%)

-

LMArena Benchmarks

LMArena ratings by capability (Bradley-Terry, commonly called Elo). Higher is better.

Text
gpt-5.1kimi-k3
1380144015001560
Overall
14391486
Coding
14741531
Math
14241424
Hard prompts
14551505
Instruction following
14271479
Multi-turn
14481499
Creative writing
14101470
Longer query
14441502
Chinese
14781527
English
14421491

Source: LMArena (arena.ai) leaderboard, imported by AIHubMix. Models without published ratings are omitted per chart.

Cost calculator

Estimate your monthly bill for the same workload on each model.

GPT 5.1
$225 /mo
Kimi K3
$405 /mo

Monthly = daily × 30. Discounted rates applied where a promotion is active.

FAQ

Which is cheaper: GPT 5.1, Kimi K3?

GPT 5.1: $10.00/M output tokens; Kimi K3: $15.00/M. Use the cost calculator above to estimate your own workload.

How do their coding arena scores compare?

Kimi K3: 1531; GPT 5.1: 1474 (LMArena coding leaderboard).

Which responds faster?

Kimi K3: 0.9s time to first token measured on AIHubMix; see the live performance charts above for how each model behaves across the day.

How large is each context window?

GPT 5.1 accepts 400,000 and Kimi K3 accepts 1,048,576 input tokens. Maximum output per request is 128,000 tokens on GPT 5.1 and 1,048,576 tokens on Kimi K3.

Which one generates tokens faster?

GPT 5.1 at 83.8 tok/s and Kimi K3 at 73.1 tok/s, measured as output throughput on AIHubMix — a separate metric from time to first token.

What inputs and capabilities does each model support?

GPT 5.1 accepts text and image input and supports thinking, web search, tool calling, deep search, function calling and structured outputs; Kimi K3 accepts text, image and video input and supports thinking, function calling and structured outputs.

Can I call GPT 5.1 and Kimi K3 with the same API key?

Yes. AIHubMix serves every model on this page behind one OpenAI-compatible endpoint, so switching between them is a one-line change to the model field — no second account, key or SDK.

Popular comparisons

Related model match-ups readers also look at.