Models

GPT 4.1 Nano (free) vs Kimi K3

Context lengths are 1,047,576 tokens on GPT 4.1 Nano (free) and 1,048,576 tokens on Kimi K3. Time to first token (TTFT) measured on AIHubMix is 0.3s on GPT 4.1 Nano (free) and 0.9s on Kimi K3. Measured output throughput is 109.6 tok/s on GPT 4.1 Nano (free) and 73.1 tok/s on Kimi K3. On the LMArena coding leaderboard GPT 4.1 Nano (free) scores 1374 and Kimi K3 scores 1531.

OpenAIGPT 4.1 Nano (free)Moonshot AIKimi K3
OpenAI logo
GPT 4.1 Nano (free)
OpenAI · text, image → text

This free model API comes from the OpenAI model deployed on Azure. To prevent abuse, the external content filter provided by Azure has been enforced, which will result in additional delays. If you want to experience the full version of the model API without filters, please use the paid version and request the model name ID without "-free".

Input$0.00 /M
Output$0.00 /M
Moonshot AI logo
Kimi K3
Moonshot AI · text, image, video → text

Kimi K3 is Kimi’s flagship model for long-horizon coding and end-to-end knowledge work, with a 1M-token context window and industry-leading intelligence.

Input$3.00 /M
Output$15.00 /M

Pricing & Specifications

Prices are per million tokens. Time to First Token and throughput are rolling averages measured on AIHubMix.

GPT 4.1 Nano (free)
Kimi K3
Input /M
$0.00
$3.00
Output /M
$0.00
$15.00
Cache read /M
$0.00
$0.30
Context length
1,047,576
1,048,576
Max output
32,768
1,048,576
Time to First Token
0.3 s
0.9 s
Throughput
109.6 tok/s
73.1 tok/s
Modalities
textimage
textimagevideo
Supported Parameters
toolsfunction callingstructured outputslong context
thinkingfunction callingstructured outputs
API Formats
Released
-
-

Promotional prices show the discounted rate; see each model page for promotion windows.

Activity Past 30 Days

Daily traffic served through AIHubMix — how demand for each model is trending.

gpt-4.1-nano-freekimi-k3

Tokens / day

-

Requests / day

-

Performance Past 3 Days

Measured on real AIHubMix traffic, hourly buckets. Gaps mean no traffic in that hour.

gpt-4.1-nano-freekimi-k3

Throughput (tok/s)

-

TTFT (s)

-

Uptime (%)

-

LMArena Benchmarks

LMArena ratings by capability (Bradley-Terry, commonly called Elo). Higher is better.

Text
gpt-4.1-nano-freekimi-k3
12401320140014801560
Overall
13221486
Coding
13741531
Math
12741274
Hard prompts
13331505
Instruction following
13011479
Multi-turn
13141499
Creative writing
13071470
Longer query
13251502
Chinese
13211527
English
13401491

Source: LMArena (arena.ai) leaderboard, imported by AIHubMix. Models without published ratings are omitted per chart.

Cost calculator

Estimate your monthly bill for the same workload on each model.

GPT 4.1 Nano (free)
$0.00 /mo
Kimi K3
$405 /mo

Monthly = daily × 30. Discounted rates applied where a promotion is active.

FAQ

How do their coding arena scores compare?

Kimi K3: 1531; GPT 4.1 Nano (free): 1374 (LMArena coding leaderboard).

Which responds faster?

GPT 4.1 Nano (free): 0.3s time to first token measured on AIHubMix; see the live performance charts above for how each model behaves across the day.

How large is each context window?

GPT 4.1 Nano (free) accepts 1,047,576 and Kimi K3 accepts 1,048,576 input tokens. Maximum output per request is 32,768 tokens on GPT 4.1 Nano (free) and 1,048,576 tokens on Kimi K3.

Which one generates tokens faster?

GPT 4.1 Nano (free) at 109.6 tok/s and Kimi K3 at 73.1 tok/s, measured as output throughput on AIHubMix — a separate metric from time to first token.

What inputs and capabilities does each model support?

GPT 4.1 Nano (free) accepts text and image input and supports tool calling, function calling, structured outputs and long context; Kimi K3 accepts text, image and video input and supports thinking, function calling and structured outputs.

Can I call GPT 4.1 Nano (free) and Kimi K3 with the same API key?

Yes. AIHubMix serves every model on this page behind one OpenAI-compatible endpoint, so switching between them is a one-line change to the model field — no second account, key or SDK.

Popular comparisons

Related model match-ups readers also look at.