GLM-5.2 is Z.ai’s flagship model for the era of long-horizon tasks. With a truly usable 1M-token context window, it can handle project-level engineering context, execute long-running tasks more reliably, follow engineering standards more consistently, and complete the full development workflow from requirements to multi-platform deployment in a single task.
GLM 5.2 vs Qwen3.6 Max Preview
Compare GLM 5.2 from Z.AI and Qwen3.6 Max Preview from Qwen on key metrics including benchmarks, price, context length, and other model features. Access both models and hundreds of others through the AIHubMix API.
GLM 5.2The Max model Preview version, the largest and most capable model in the Qwen3.6 series, currently offers its pure-text model capabilities for trial. Compared with the previously released Qwen3-Max and Qwen3.6-Plus, this model further enhances vibe coding capabilities, executes coding agents more efficiently, significantly improves front-end programming and development capabilities, and further upgrades long-tail knowledge handling.
Pricing & Specifications
Prices are per million tokens. Time to First Token and throughput are rolling averages measured on AIHubMix.
Promotional prices show the discounted rate; see each model page for promotion windows.
Activity Past 30 Days
Daily traffic served through AIHubMix — how demand for each model is trending.
Tokens / day
Requests / day
Performance Past 3 Days
Measured on real AIHubMix traffic, hourly buckets. Gaps mean no traffic in that hour.
Throughput (tok/s)
TTFT (s)
Uptime (%)
LMArena Benchmarks
LMArena ratings by capability (Bradley-Terry, commonly called Elo). Higher is better.
Source: LMArena (arena.ai) leaderboard, imported by AIHubMix. Models without published ratings are omitted per chart.
Cost calculator
Estimate your monthly bill for the same workload on each model.
Monthly = daily × 30. Discounted rates applied where a promotion is active.
FAQ
Which is cheaper: GLM 5.2, Qwen3.6 Max Preview?
GLM 5.2: $3.94/M output tokens; Qwen3.6 Max Preview: $7.61/M. Use the cost calculator above to estimate your own workload.
How do their coding arena scores compare?
Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 1509; GLM 5.2: 1505 (LMArena coding leaderboard).
Which responds faster?
Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 0.7s time to first token measured on AIHubMix; see the live performance charts above for how each model behaves across the day.
How large is each context window?
GLM 5.2 accepts 1,000,000 and Qwen3.6 Max Preview accepts 240,000 input tokens. Maximum output per request is 128,000 tokens on GLM 5.2 and 64,000 tokens on Qwen3.6 Max Preview.
Which one generates tokens faster?
Qwen3.6 Max Preview at 185.4 tok/s and GLM 5.2 at 38.0 tok/s, measured as output throughput on AIHubMix — a separate metric from time to first token.
What inputs and capabilities does each model support?
GLM 5.2 accepts text input and supports thinking, tool calling, function calling and structured outputs; Qwen3.6 Max Preview accepts text input and supports tool calling, function calling, structured outputs, web search, long context and thinking.
Can I call GLM 5.2 and Qwen3.6 Max Preview with the same API key?
Yes. AIHubMix serves every model on this page behind one OpenAI-compatible endpoint, so switching between them is a one-line change to the model field — no second account, key or SDK.
Popular comparisons
Related model match-ups readers also look at.
