GLM-5.2 is Z.ai’s flagship model for the era of long-horizon tasks. With a truly usable 1M-token context window, it can handle project-level engineering context, execute long-running tasks more reliably, follow engineering standards more consistently, and complete the full development workflow from requirements to multi-platform deployment in a single task.
GLM 5.2 vs Qwen3.6 Flash
Output tokens cost $3.94 per million on GLM 5.2 and $1.01 per million on Qwen3.6 Flash. Input tokens cost $1.13 per million on GLM 5.2 and $0.17 per million on Qwen3.6 Flash. Cached input tokens are billed at $0.28 per million on GLM 5.2 and $0.02 per million on Qwen3.6 Flash. Context lengths are 1,000,000 tokens on GLM 5.2 and 991,000 tokens on Qwen3.6 Flash. Time to first token (TTFT) measured on AIHubMix is 1.1s on GLM 5.2 and 0.8s on Qwen3.6 Flash. Measured output throughput is 37.9 tok/s on GLM 5.2 and 136.8 tok/s on Qwen3.6 Flash.
GLM 5.2Qwen 3.6, the native vision-language Plus series model, demonstrates outstanding performance comparable to the current top cutting-edge models, with a significant improvement over the 3.5 series. The model's capabilities have been markedly enhanced in Agentic coding, front-end programming, Vibe coding and other coding abilities, universal multimodal recognition, OCR, object localization, and more.
Pricing & Specifications
Prices are per million tokens. Time to First Token and throughput are rolling averages measured on AIHubMix.
Promotional prices show the discounted rate; see each model page for promotion windows.
Activity Past 30 Days
Daily traffic served through AIHubMix — how demand for each model is trending.
Tokens / day
Requests / day
Performance Past 3 Days
Measured on real AIHubMix traffic, hourly buckets. Gaps mean no traffic in that hour.
Throughput (tok/s)
TTFT (s)
Uptime (%)
Cost calculator
Estimate your monthly bill for the same workload on each model.
Monthly = daily × 30. Discounted rates applied where a promotion is active.
FAQ
Which is cheaper: GLM 5.2, Qwen3.6 Flash?
Qwen3.6 Flash: $1.01/M output tokens; GLM 5.2: $3.94/M. Use the cost calculator above to estimate your own workload.
Which responds faster?
Qwen3.6 Flash: 0.8s time to first token measured on AIHubMix; see the live performance charts above for how each model behaves across the day.
How large is each context window?
GLM 5.2 accepts 1,000,000 and Qwen3.6 Flash accepts 991,000 input tokens. Maximum output per request is 128,000 tokens on GLM 5.2 and 64,000 tokens on Qwen3.6 Flash.
Which one generates tokens faster?
Qwen3.6 Flash at 136.8 tok/s and GLM 5.2 at 37.9 tok/s, measured as output throughput on AIHubMix — a separate metric from time to first token.
What inputs and capabilities does each model support?
GLM 5.2 accepts text input and supports thinking, tool calling, function calling and structured outputs; Qwen3.6 Flash accepts text, image and video input and supports tool calling, function calling, structured outputs, web search, long context and thinking.
Can I call GLM 5.2 and Qwen3.6 Flash with the same API key?
Yes. AIHubMix serves every model on this page behind one OpenAI-compatible endpoint, so switching between them is a one-line change to the model field — no second account, key or SDK.
Popular comparisons
Related model match-ups readers also look at.
